• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUDemocracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "EU Integration and Enlargement",
    "Brexit and UK Politics"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Western Europe",
    "United Kingdom",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "EU"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Cameron, Brexit and Russia

Between now and 2017, David Cameron has to move fast and work hard to explain why the EU matters and why it is in Britain’s strategic interest to remain inside it.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on May 11, 2015

Source: The Moscow Times

Minutes after David Cameron knew he had been re-elected Britain's prime minister, and with a majority, the leader of the Conservative Party repeated his promise to hold a referendum in 2017. He will ask the British people if they want to remain in the European Union or leave it.

The outcome of that referendum will have far-reaching consequences for Britain, for Europe and for Russia.

A Brexit (a British exit) from the EU would have devastating consequences for Britain and Europe. Britain would be isolated.

And if those among the British Eurosceptic public and the political elites believe they could manage quite well because of the special Anglo-American relationship, they are deceiving themselves.

The relationship between Washington and London is not what it used to be 10 years ago. The United States has other strategic interests.

Besides, it is German Chancellor Angela Merkel who is far more important a partner for U.S. President Barack Obama than David Cameron. This has been clear from almost the beginning of the Ukraine crisis.

It was Merkel who pushed the European Union into imposing sanctions on Russia after it annexed Crimea in March 2014. It was Merkel who stiffened Cameron's backbone when it came to the sanctions issue. Merkel's Germany is the undisputed leader of Europe.

However, even though British influence is waning in the EU, a Brexit would do untold damage to the integrity of the EU. The EU would lose a country whose input to security, strategy and defense issues cannot be underestimated.

No wonder the United States has long supported Britain remaining in the EU. Washington wants a strong and competitive Europe, a goal shared by the Baltic states and other Eastern European countries. These EU member states dread the idea of Britain leaving because it would give Eurosceptics and populists such a boost that the precedent could be established for other countries to consider quitting.

One country that would relish a Brexit is Russia. A Brexit would undoubtedly weaken the EU, which is in Russia's interests. That is why Merkel will do her utmost to try and find a way to ensure that Britain remains inside the EU, not outside.

Another dimension to a Brexit would be the fate of Scotland, which Russia has been watching closely. The Scottish National Party (SNP) now wields enormous influence in the House of Commons. Apart from wanting a discussion about the future of Trident, Britain's nuclear deterrent system, the SNP are pro-European and pro-independence from the United Kingdom.

Even though Scots voted against leaving the United Kingdom in their own referendum held in September 2014, the issue has not gone away.

It would be revived if Britain pulls out of the EU. Under such circumstances, the Scots could have another chance to say yes or no to remaining in the United Kingdom — and by implication to leaving the EU. And here is another plus for Russia.

If the British chose to leave the EU and as a consequence, the Scots chose to leave the United Kingdom, then a smaller Britain would be weaker and less influential.

Furthermore, a Scottish independence vote could embolden other independent movements inside the EU. Maybe the EU could live with that. But tensions between the regions and the central government in several countries could scupper any plans to further integrate the EU.

That would suit Russia too. A strong and integrated EU is not in Russia's interests.

Cameron can change all that. His outright victory means he should have the confidence, influence and power to move ahead with more devolution for Scotland — and Wales.

He also has to begin the long overdue debate about Europe. Europe played no role during the election campaign.

Between now and 2017, Cameron has to move fast and work hard to explain to his own Eurosceptic backbenchers why Europe matters and why it is Britain's strategic interests to remain inside it. That is why Cameron's victory and what he wants to do with it matters for Europe and Russia.

This article was originally published in The Moscow Times.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyEUEuropeWestern EuropeUnited KingdomIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy Now

    Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.

      Alissa de Carbonnel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order
    Report
    Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order

    As the EU confronts profound challenges, several leaders have called for fundamental reform to the union’s model—but only modest, superficial changes have resulted. What if Europe really could be reimagined from zero today: What should such a redesigned European order look like?

      Richard Youngs, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Sycophancy Worked on Trump

    Nearly a year and a half after Europeans leaned into sucking up to Trump, the strategy has produced some benefits when it comes to Ukraine.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.