• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUDemocracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The BrahMos Is Just Beginning

The joint India-Russia missile project BrahMos has been the single most successful joint military-technical collaboration between the two countries, and it appears the prospects for its usage are just beginning. Both countries need to increase this kind of strategic collaboration.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Jul 3, 2015

Source: Russia & India Report

Russia and India have a well-developed system for military-technical relations.

In recent years, there have been a number of great successes in their cooperation in these spheres.

The BrahMos project, in particular, is one of the most significant accomplishments of military-technical cooperation between India and Russia.

The creation of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile however, remains the sole example of Russian-Indian cooperation in military technology which resulted in the creation of a product which is greatly superior to similar products produced in developed countries.

On 12 February 1998, Russia and India signed an Agreement between the two governments on the ‘Joint Development and Production of Missile Complexes with the Anti-Ship Missile (BrahMos).’

Based on these documents, a joint enterprise BrahMos Airspace Ltd. was established, with a registered capital of $250 million dollars. The share in the joint venture was divided as: 49.5% to Russia and 50.5% to India. The first flight tests for the BrahMos (named after the rivers Brahmaputra and Moskva) took place in 2001.

In 2004, the Indian government proposed that the country’s Armed Forces adopt the missiles into service.

The Indian Navy initiated the process of adopting the missiles in 2005, the Army, in 2007.

According to this year’s data, the Indian Army has two regiments armed with BrahMos missiles, while a third regiment is being equipped. The decision about a fourth regiment has been made, and missiles for the fifth and sixth regiments may be ordered by the end of this year. (Each regiment, armed with four launchers and ninety missiles, costs an estimated at $300 million dollars).

According to official data from 2013, the Indian Navy has eight ships equipped with launchers for BrahMos missiles. In fact, however, India only has six ships with the BrahMos: Rajput, Ranveer, and Ranvijay destroyers (according to domestic classification, these are the Project 61ME anti-submarine ships) and Teg, Tarkash, and Trikand frigates (Project 11356 patrol ships).

New versions of the BrahMos missiles are being developed for submarine and aircraft carriers. On March 20th 2013 the first test launch of the missile from an underwater platform took place. In 2015 preparations for the test launch of the BrahMos from the Su-30MKI fighter jet were announced.

But, despite being half a tonne lighter and half a metre shorter, the BrahMos rocket was too heavy for the aircraft. The fighter could take off, but landing was difficult if the missile wasn’t launched, forcing the Indian Air Force to abandon plans to equip the Su-30MKIs with three missiles. The two airplanes prepared for test launches of the BrahMos, can only carry one missile.

In line with plans to equip submarines and fighters with this missile, a decision was taken in 2014 to build the mini-BrahMos. A smaller missile will make it possible to launch them on submarine torpedoes and equip not only Su-30MKI but also MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB, based on the Vikramaditya aircraft carriers, with them.

It is in both Moscow and Delhi’s interests to initiate new strategic projects like the BrahMos. This would help Russia strengthen its position in India’s arms market, as it is a country cooperating in such critical areas where other countries are not ready to share and develop military technology jointly with India.

The joint efforts of Moscow and India could create components or whole systems for strategically important weapons. In modern conditions, such cooperation would undoubtedly serve Russia’s interests.

After the deterioration in relations with several countries because of the Ukraine crisis, obstacles have arisen for Russia to obtain several components used in manufacturing Russian military products. The sanctions imposed on Russia by these countries after the annexation of Crimea “has somewhat slowed down the pace of our work,” said A.P. Isaikin, Rosoboronexport’s General Director.

Until the current crisis, Russian arms manufacturers worked with about 100 companies from 28 countries. It does not appear an unsolvable task to replace the foreign countries that decline to continue supplying components for armaments and military hardware of Russian manufacture. The re-orientation towards such states as the BRICS members and, above all, India will help resolve the problem.

India can be distinguished from the remaining BRICS states in that it has the richest and most varied experience cooperating with Russia in the field of high technology.

In the case of China, when taking into account its active copying of military technologies, including acquiring them through technological espionage, and pursuit of arms markets traditional for Russia, it becomes clear why a project similar to that of the BrahMos has not come about with Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation.

This article originally appeared in Russia & India Report.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Entanglement: Chinese and Russian Perspectives on Non-nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks
      • +3

      James M. Acton, Alexey Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, …

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
EconomySecurityMilitaryForeign PolicySouth AsiaIndiaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Cannot Negotiate a New Yalta with Russia

    While Russia is not ready to sue for peace on Europe’s terms, it could still either seek a ceasefire in Ukraine or try escalation. Brussels needs to prepare for both and prioritize that preparation over normative discussions.

      Kadri Liik

  • Agentic AI Anthropic bot
    Paper
    When AI Agents Attack: Autonomous Cyber Operations and Europe’s Governance Gap

    Autonomous AI agents are increasingly prevalent in cyberspace. The EU needs a real-time monitoring strategy, to invest in AI defenses, and to reduce its strategic dependence on U.S. frontier models.

      Raluca Csernatoni, Patryk Pawlak

  • Turkey ship Istanbul Bosporus Straits Black Sea
    Article
    Managing Montreux: Turkey and the Russia-Ukraine War in the Black Sea

    For ninety years, Turkey has been positioned as the principal gatekeeper of Black Sea security. As a result, European and NATO efforts to support Ukraine will require closer engagement with Ankara.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Geopolitical Europe Needs Air-Conditioning

    Western Europe’s dual-use infrastructure melted down during its latest heat wave. If a predicted hot weather event can take the continent by surprise, what chance does it have to withstand unexpected geopolitical crises?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Trump-Shaped Hole in the European Security Strategy

    There is an elephant in the room when it comes to the EU’s upcoming security strategy: Donald Trump. Unless European leaders acknowledge the depth of the transatlantic crisis, true autonomy will remain out of reach.

      Stefan Lehne

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.