• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The BrahMos Is Just Beginning

The joint India-Russia missile project BrahMos has been the single most successful joint military-technical collaboration between the two countries, and it appears the prospects for its usage are just beginning. Both countries need to increase this kind of strategic collaboration.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Jul 3, 2015

Source: Russia & India Report

Russia and India have a well-developed system for military-technical relations.

In recent years, there have been a number of great successes in their cooperation in these spheres.

The BrahMos project, in particular, is one of the most significant accomplishments of military-technical cooperation between India and Russia.

The creation of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile however, remains the sole example of Russian-Indian cooperation in military technology which resulted in the creation of a product which is greatly superior to similar products produced in developed countries.

On 12 February 1998, Russia and India signed an Agreement between the two governments on the ‘Joint Development and Production of Missile Complexes with the Anti-Ship Missile (BrahMos).’

Based on these documents, a joint enterprise BrahMos Airspace Ltd. was established, with a registered capital of $250 million dollars. The share in the joint venture was divided as: 49.5% to Russia and 50.5% to India. The first flight tests for the BrahMos (named after the rivers Brahmaputra and Moskva) took place in 2001.

In 2004, the Indian government proposed that the country’s Armed Forces adopt the missiles into service.

The Indian Navy initiated the process of adopting the missiles in 2005, the Army, in 2007.

According to this year’s data, the Indian Army has two regiments armed with BrahMos missiles, while a third regiment is being equipped. The decision about a fourth regiment has been made, and missiles for the fifth and sixth regiments may be ordered by the end of this year. (Each regiment, armed with four launchers and ninety missiles, costs an estimated at $300 million dollars).

According to official data from 2013, the Indian Navy has eight ships equipped with launchers for BrahMos missiles. In fact, however, India only has six ships with the BrahMos: Rajput, Ranveer, and Ranvijay destroyers (according to domestic classification, these are the Project 61ME anti-submarine ships) and Teg, Tarkash, and Trikand frigates (Project 11356 patrol ships).

New versions of the BrahMos missiles are being developed for submarine and aircraft carriers. On March 20th 2013 the first test launch of the missile from an underwater platform took place. In 2015 preparations for the test launch of the BrahMos from the Su-30MKI fighter jet were announced.

But, despite being half a tonne lighter and half a metre shorter, the BrahMos rocket was too heavy for the aircraft. The fighter could take off, but landing was difficult if the missile wasn’t launched, forcing the Indian Air Force to abandon plans to equip the Su-30MKIs with three missiles. The two airplanes prepared for test launches of the BrahMos, can only carry one missile.

In line with plans to equip submarines and fighters with this missile, a decision was taken in 2014 to build the mini-BrahMos. A smaller missile will make it possible to launch them on submarine torpedoes and equip not only Su-30MKI but also MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB, based on the Vikramaditya aircraft carriers, with them.

It is in both Moscow and Delhi’s interests to initiate new strategic projects like the BrahMos. This would help Russia strengthen its position in India’s arms market, as it is a country cooperating in such critical areas where other countries are not ready to share and develop military technology jointly with India.

The joint efforts of Moscow and India could create components or whole systems for strategically important weapons. In modern conditions, such cooperation would undoubtedly serve Russia’s interests.

After the deterioration in relations with several countries because of the Ukraine crisis, obstacles have arisen for Russia to obtain several components used in manufacturing Russian military products. The sanctions imposed on Russia by these countries after the annexation of Crimea “has somewhat slowed down the pace of our work,” said A.P. Isaikin, Rosoboronexport’s General Director.

Until the current crisis, Russian arms manufacturers worked with about 100 companies from 28 countries. It does not appear an unsolvable task to replace the foreign countries that decline to continue supplying components for armaments and military hardware of Russian manufacture. The re-orientation towards such states as the BRICS members and, above all, India will help resolve the problem.

India can be distinguished from the remaining BRICS states in that it has the richest and most varied experience cooperating with Russia in the field of high technology.

In the case of China, when taking into account its active copying of military technologies, including acquiring them through technological espionage, and pursuit of arms markets traditional for Russia, it becomes clear why a project similar to that of the BrahMos has not come about with Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation.

This article originally appeared in Russia & India Report.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

  • In The Media
    Premonition of Nuclear Threat

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
EconomySecurityMilitaryForeign PolicySouth AsiaIndiaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity

    The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.

      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?

    Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?

    Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?

      Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.