• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Arushi Kumar"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Belt and Road Initiative"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "South Asia",
    "Afghanistan",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Why China’s One Belt, One Road Matters for Afghanistan

By deepening its political, economic and military engagement in Afghanistan, and by formally signing a Memorandum of Understanding in 2016, China seems to be emerging as a long-term player in the region’s new Great Game.

Link Copied
By Arushi Kumar
Published on May 12, 2017

Source: South Asian Voices

As the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation takes place in Beijing this weekend, a high-level delegation from Kabul will be in attendance with the hope of hastening the implementation of many infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. China has already become the large source of foreign direct investment in Afghanistan, especially after Afghanistan’s energy, minerals, and raw material sector opened up in 2007. It is also concerned about quelling the rise of extremism from Uighur jihadists in the Xinjiang region that shares a border with Afghanistan. Finally, the success of the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative is contingent upon lasting peace and stability in the region. By deepening its political, economic and military engagement in Afghanistan, and by formally signing an OBOR Memorandum of Understanding in 2016, China seems to be emerging as a long-term player in the region’s new Great Game.

The OBOR is the lynchpin of China’s geo-economic strategy to expand China’s extra-regional influence and resolve its Malacca Dilemma. To achieve this, Beijing is reorienting access to Middle Eastern energy resources by comprehensively linking Eurasia through a network of railways and highways. Afghanistan seeks to benefit by pinning its hopes on China to develop its infrastructure and connectivity after being ravaged by decades of war.

China has taken significant steps to develop the OBOR initiative. The New Silk Road Fund of $40 billion, the China Development Bank’s $900 billion and a substantial share of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank’s $100 billion is expected to support 900 projects across 60 countries. OBOR’s offshoot, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, has also drawn Chinese investments of over $62 billion. Any instability emanating from neighboring Afghanistan would limit Beijing’s expansive infrastructural and connectivity ambitions.

Chinese economic aid to Afghanistan has increased significantly since OBOR was launched in 2013. China provided Afghanistan with approximately $240 million in aid over twelve years between 2001 and 2013. In contrast, in 2015, it pledged to provide $327 million by the end of 2017. Beijing also offered 500 scholarships to Afghan students to study in China and train 3000 Afghans in various professions including counterterrorism and agriculture. Further, China is investing in a housing project worth $300 million that will fund 10,000 apartments in Kabul. As a part of OBOR, China is also improving its own connectivity to Afghanistan. The first train from China was linked to Hairatan in northern Afghanistan via Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. By investing in railways, China is also weaving land-locked Afghanistan into an integrated economic system and reducing its dependence on transit routes through Pakistan.

Beijing and Kabul’s security cooperation has been limited, but this is rapidly changing. Beijing offered military aid to Afghanistan for the first time in 2016. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and General Fang Fenghui, chief of China’s joint staff department, also discussed expanding security cooperation, for which Afghanistan is reportedly interested in logistical equipment, light weapons, aircraft components, military uniforms, and ammunition for the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces. Despite official denial of the presence of Chinese troops within Afghan borders, Afghanistan and China have reportedly started joint patrols in Little Pamir in northeastern Afghanistan. Both countries will also hold a joint counterterrorism exercise involving the Afghan Special Forces in China this year.

Sino-Afghan diplomatic relations have deepened conspicuously since 2014. Ghani chose to visit China on his first official overseas visit as president. Beijing also hosted the Heart of Asia Conference in 2014, which sought to expand cooperation between Afghanistan and its neighbors. Following multiple interactions between high-level diplomatic and military delegations, China and Afghanistan also signed several significant bilateral cooperation agreements in China last year.

China’s ambitious project of regional connectivity through Central Asia is conditioned on sustained stability in Afghanistan. It has facilitated peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban since 2014, stating that it believes reconciliation through negotiations is the best way to ensure lasting peace, and was part of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG). Despite the failure of the QCG, Afghanistan continues to look to China to assert influence over Pakistan to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table.

The Chinese Ambassador to Afghanistan, Yao Jing has said: “Without Afghan connectivity, there is no way to connect China with the rest of the world.” China is using all means at its disposal to protect long-term economic interests in Afghanistan, while increasing its security presence to prevent extremists from fomenting unrest in the neighboring Xinjiang region. Kabul, in turn, hopes OBOR will help Afghanistan accelerate economic growth, emerge as a hub of regional trade, and overcome internal security threats.

This article was originally published in South Asian Voices.

About the Author

Arushi Kumar

Arushi Kumar
EconomyForeign PolicyAsiaSouth AsiaAfghanistanIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

    Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?

    France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

    France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    How Can Europe Renew a Stalled Enlargement Process?

    Despite offering security benefits to candidates and the EU alike, the enlargement agenda appears stalled. Why is progress not being made, and is it time for Europe to rethink its approach?

      Sylvie Goulard, Gerald Knaus

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.