• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Ashley J. Tellis"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Taiwan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade",
    "Security",
    "Military"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Sign a Free-Trade Deal With Taiwan

Free trade with Taiwan would secure U.S. economic interests while strengthening U.S. alliances with China’s rivals.

Link Copied
By Ashley J. Tellis
Published on Dec 3, 2018

Source: Wall Street Journal

As President Trump pursues bilateral free-trade agreements with Japan and South Korea, one East Asian country has fallen off the radar: Taiwan. This lapse may prove economically and strategically costly for the U.S.

The Trump administration’s obsession with bilateral trade deals, rather than multilateral agreements, is controversial. But its ambitions to secure better terms of trade while deepening strategic partnerships with China’s rivals should not be. A trade deal with Taiwan would advance both objectives splendidly.

For a small, diplomatically isolated country, Taiwan plays an outsize role in global trade, especially in strategically vital sectors like communication technologies, chemicals and transportation. Taiwan is America’s 11th-largest trading partner, with two-way trade approaching $90 billion annually, according to the American Institute in Taiwan. The island nation attracted more than $24 billion in foreign direct investment from the U.S. in 2016, and it’s also America’s seventh-largest export market for agricultural goods. A free-trade agreement with Taipei would significantly expand commerce with a country that does not threaten U.S. interests.

In addition to its technological excellence, Taiwan’s strategic isolation makes it an especially attractive economic partner. The threat from China means Taiwan has a strong incentive to deepen ties to the U.S. Accordingly, it doesn’t seek preferential access to the U.S. market, as developing Asian countries often do. It merely wants stable commercial access to the U.S. to increase its growth rate and improve its political survivability. This gives the Trump administration an opportunity to negotiate a good deal, which could take effect speedily and then become a model for other agreements with Asian states.

A deal with Taiwan could also help secure U.S. and allied supply chains. Before the 1980s, many foreign producers of sensitive technologies, including South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, produced them in their home countries for direct export to the U.S. One consequence of accelerated globalization is that the production of many sophisticated electronic components, such as chip sets and optronics—which are crucial for advanced defense systems—is migrating to China.

But as Chinese assertiveness has grown, Taiwanese and Japanese companies have been looking for opportunities to shift their investments either to friendly countries or back home. A U.S.-Taiwan pact would accelerate the reorganization of Asian supply chains away from China and reduce China’s ability to coerce America and its East Asian allies in times of crisis.

Finally, a free-trade agreement would demonstrate American solidarity with Taiwan at a time when China is intensifying its efforts to deny the small island nation international representation and diplomatic ties with other countries. A deal would help limit and reverse this isolation, while also promoting U.S. prosperity and economic security. There is a big win here, waiting for the Trump administration to seize it.

This article was originally posted in the Wall Street Journal.

About the Author

Ashley J. Tellis

Former Senior Fellow

Ashley J. Tellis was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Multipolar Dreams, Bipolar Realities: India’s Great Power Future

      Ashley J. Tellis

  • Commentary
    India Sees Opportunity in Trump’s Global Turbulence. That Could Backfire.

      Ashley J. Tellis

Ashley J. Tellis
Former Senior Fellow
EconomyTradeSecurityMilitarySouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaChinaTaiwan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Stare Down China on Trade?

    The European Commissioner for Trade is headed to China. But after President Xi’s bridge-building visit to Washington, can a more isolated EU overcome Beijing’s stranglehold on critical raw materials? Who will blink first?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in Ukraine

    The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Greenland United States Denmark Agreement Nuuk
    Commentary
    The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time

    The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.

      Marc Pierini

  • Ukraine Russia Black Sea Food
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    A Black Sea Truce Is About Global Food Security, Too

    A summer of escalation in the Black Sea has hurt Ukraine economically and is exacerbating world food security. A truce is needed—as is a broader reframing of Europe’s Ukraine strategy.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a Germany Problem?

    Are Germany’s economic, industrial, and political struggles becoming a liability for the EU’s ability to rise to the geopolitical moment?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.