• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "scholarSpotlight",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "GOI",
  "programs": [
    "Global Order and Institutions"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Democracy",
    "Climate Change",
    "Security",
    "Global Governance"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Scholar Spotlight

New Director Spotlight: Stewart Patrick

My work at Carnegie explores how innovations in multilateral cooperation can help national governments as well as private and subnational actors manage the common risks of—and realize shared benefits from—interdependence.

Link Copied
Published on Sep 12, 2022

The biggest test confronting humanity is figuring out how to live peacefully and sustainably on a divided and fragile planet. It’s a challenge compounded by a structural dilemma: the world’s biggest problems are transnational, yet the globe is partitioned into nearly 200 sovereign nations, each pursuing its own interests. My work at Carnegie explores how innovations in multilateral cooperation can help national governments as well as private and subnational actors manage the common risks of—and realize shared benefits from—interdependence. This is the mandate that Andrew Carnegie gave the endowment more than a century ago, and it has never been more urgent.

When I began my career in the early post–Cold War era, many observers anticipated that the inexorable dynamics of globalization would encourage convergence toward the liberal values and principles that underpinned the largely open, Western-dominated international system. Those hopes were not borne out. World politics has proven stubbornly complex, competitive, and conflictual. Emerging powers have promoted alternative visions of world order. Populists and nationalists have turned their backs on globalization. Democracy has retreated while authoritarianism has advanced. And established international organizations have struggled to adjust to rising powers and adapt to new threats, including those driven by the blistering pace of technological change. Meanwhile the United States, the erstwhile champion of the liberal world order, has oscillated between defending and rejecting internationalism, a phenomenon I analyzed in my book The Sovereignty Wars: Reconciling America with the World. Nowhere are the failures of multilateral cooperation more glaring than in the desultory global response to the existential threat of climate change.

These are troubling trends, but they are not insurmountable. The trajectory of our species has been deeply shaped by ingenuity and cooperation, allowing us to survive, albeit—in the words of the playwright Thornton Wilder—by “the skin of our teeth.” Years ago, as a student of evolution, I spent two memorable summers on a paleoanthropological expedition in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, one of the cradles of humanity. Hominid fossils proved scarce, but strewn about the stratigraphy were gleaming white hand axes, hewn from quartz by Homo erectus. Thanks to such technology—and a willingness to cooperate—our ancestors were able to flourish in that austere environment and, eventually, to populate new continents.

We’ve come a long way since, but we need innovation and cooperation more than ever. I’m excited to work with my talented Carnegie colleagues in reimagining the institutional foundations for world order in the twenty-first century. Together, we’ll explore how to forge agreement among diverse countries and peoples on basic rules of international conduct and sovereign state obligations. We’ll help expand the frontiers of multilateralism, including by showcasing the growing role that subnational actors (including U.S. states and cities) can play in solving global problems. We’ll investigate how to improve the performance and democratic accountability of international bodies, as well as how to expand representation and voice from the Global South within them. We’ll propose new approaches to regulating the global commons, as well as transformative technologies that present shared risks. Finally, we’ll identify what new global rules are needed to preserve the biosphere, so that humanity can finally govern the world as if the Earth mattered.

As a child, I was a fan of the weekly TV show Big Blue Marble. The kid-friendly documentary series afforded American youngsters a window into the lives of their far-flung counterparts around the globe. The title was inspired by the famous “Earthrise” photo taken by Apollo 8 astronauts that depicts a vibrant, lonely sphere in the cold darkness of space and underscores humanity’s essential unity. I’m an adult now, but I remain enough of an idealist to believe that we can find sufficient common ground not only to survive but also to thrive on our small planet.

DemocracyClimate ChangeSecurityGlobal GovernanceUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is European Diplomacy on Iran Outdated?

    When the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding was announced, the UK, France, Germany, and Italy declared their readiness to help demine the Strait of Hormuz and lift nuclear sanctions on Tehran. But does Europe need new tools to recover a diplomatic role?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    France and Germany Need Their Own Situation Room

    The Franco-German relationship is on the rocks again. But unlike previous moments of tension, the epochal changes on the world stage require that both step up investment in their bilateral ties.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Europe trade economy container supply chains
    Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

    As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Security Strategy: In Search of a New Ambition

    The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Climate Blind Spot in Europe’s New Migration Pact

    The EU’s new migration policy is not suited to today’s realities. With climate change increasingly becoming a driver of displacement, Europe needs to rethink its deterrence-focused approach.

      • Shana Tabak headshot

      Shana Tabak

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.