Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change",
"EU"
]
}Source: Getty
A Better Franco-German Couple than Before
Merkel and Hollande know why they have to work together, and they will have to do so quickly if Europe is to emerge from the euro crisis.
Don’t believe for one minute that the two most powerful leaders in Europe will not be able to work together.
Of course, Angela Merkel knows she made a big mistake by putting all her eggs in Nicolas Sarkozy’s basket during the French presidential election campaign. I wonder what her advisors were thinking at the time?
Merkel’s decision was also out of character. Throwing caution to the wind is normally not like her.
So when it became clear that Francois Hollande was going to defeat Sarkozy, the Chancellery moved into top gear.
Merkel’s European policy advisor, Nikolaus Meyer-Landrut, a Francophone and staunch supporter of European integration, had little difficulty in reaching out to Hollande’s advisors.
Hollande himself, as early as last February, had dispatched teams to Berlin to obtain some sense of Merkel’s thinking but also to talk to federal lawmakers and foreign ministry officials.
In short, the ground was well prepared for last Tuesday’s meeting. When Hollande arrived in Berlin on Tuesday evening, Merkel was all bonhomie.
No one should underestimate her smiles, her gestures, and her ability to make her guests feel genuinely welcome.
When Hollande, flanked by Merkel, inspected the guard of honor, during a brief respite from the rain which had already drenched him back in Paris during his post-inauguration parade, Merkel chaperoned him very nicely. She guided him, with the slightest of pushes, to turn the corner of the red carpet and continue with the inspection. Then, a few seconds later, she gestured to him that they should bow together. After that, it was marching orders, with some guidance, to end the ceremony.
Then it was down to dinner, and business, in the Chancellery.
Both leaders know exactly how deep their differences over the euro crisis run: Berlin still believes in austerity measures to balance the books. Paris believes a dose of Keynesianism to be a necessary palliative.
But at the short press conference after their dinner both agreed they were looking forward to working with each other anyway.
Actually, the history of Franco-German relations shows that leaders from the opposite political parties get on far better that those of similar ideological inclination.
Helmut Kohl, a conservative, managed to establish a close relationship with Francois Mitterrand, a socialist. It was even closer between Gerhard Schroder, a Social Democrat and Jacques Chirac.
In contrast, Merkel failed to have any empathy with Chirac. And it took her a long time – and all the pressure of the euro crisis – to develop any kind of a relationship with Sarkozy.
But they never seemed to share that sense of historical necessity to use the special Franco-German relationship for European ends.
Hollande, a sober, calm, persistent man whose character suits Merkel far better than his predecessor did, might just produce that spark that is needed to modernize the Franco-German relationship in a way that will strengthen Europe.
The fact that he has chosen Jean-Marc Ayrault, a former German professor and Germanophile as his prime minister seems very promising.
Let’s hope that they will not forget the wider issues of foreign policy.
Of course, both leaders know they have to tackle the euro crisis. Both leaders also have their electorates to satisfy. Don’t forget that Merkel faces re-election in 2013 so she might be a bit preoccupied.
Nevertheless, Hollande and Merkel will have to also find some time to work out the kind of relationship Europe wants with Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, not to mention Turkey, the Middle East, and China.
These relationships are too important to be kept to the bilateral and national interest level. Europe has to think strategically about them. The future of the continent depends on that.
This means that once Hollande settles into the Elysee, his foreign policy advisors must be given rein to engage Germany and the rest of Europe in drawing up a new Security Strategy. The euro crisis is important, but France and Germany cannot continue to hide behind. It is time to develop a new foreign and security policy.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Germany’s Shattered ConsensusCommentary
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is SayingCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a Germany Problem?Commentary
Are Germany’s economic, industrial, and political struggles becoming a liability for the EU’s ability to rise to the geopolitical moment?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The Speech Ursula von der Leyen Can’t DeliverCommentary
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is about to give her annual address on the state of the EU. Here’s what she won’t—but should—say.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe Fails to Learn the Lessons from CeutaCommentary
The aftermath of the Ceuta crisis shows Europe has drawn the wrong lessons. Rather than doubling down on failed migration policies, the EU needs to address the underlying roots of such episodes.
Richard Youngs
- Germany’s Shattered ConsensusCommentary
An overwhelming victory by a far-right-wing party in a small state in eastern Germany will have major repercussions for Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s coalition.
Judy Dempsey
- Taking the Pulse: Is Canada Leading a Third Way?Commentary
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has twice inspired praise for standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump: at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos and on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. Is Carney showing a third way better than the EU has in dealing with the Trump administration?
Rym Momtaz, ed.