The U.S. administration now hopes that EU leaders will follow suit. During their summit, they agreed to announce further sanctions by the end of July. These could include stopping loans by the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development that finance projects in Russia.

But will these sanctions be enough to stop Russia’s continuing interference in eastern Ukraine?

As it is, some 12,000 Russian troops are now on the border with Ukraine, according to the Pentagon. NATO has been consistently outspoken over the way in which Russia has been providing military assistance and personnel to rebel fighters in eastern Ukraine. In other words, Putin is in a position to stop supplying the rebels if he wanted to.

As German Chancellor Angela Merkel said just before the start of the EU summit, “the Russian contribution for peace in Ukraine is not sufficient.” That’s putting it mildly.

Putin has fallen short of invading eastern Ukraine, knowing full well that the response by the United States and Europe would be tough. Instead, he is invading by stealth in such a way that Russia’s support for the rebels continues to chisel away at Ukraine’s sovereignty and stability.

Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s president, has taken a firm hold over the armed forces in a bid to rid them of corruption and quickly train and equip them to regain control over eastern Ukraine. He has had some success. Earlier in July, the army retook some towns from the separatists. But even then, the rebels were able to shoot down Ukrainian military aircraft, which shows just how well they are armed.

As the fighting continues and casualties rise—over 1,000 people have been killed since April—this is not the time for the Europeans to wobble. Yet that is exactly what they are doing. Austria and Italy, Slovakia and Bulgaria, to name just a few EU countries, oppose further sanctions against Russia.

That’s not just because these countries have lucrative energy deals with Moscow or are dependent on Russia for their gas. It’s also because they don’t seem to realize how Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its continuing strategy to destabilize Ukraine are dangerous for Europe.

Indeed, the more Putin receives support from several EU leaders, the more he can gain succor from Europe’s inability to unite over an issue that should be fundamental to European values and interests. Those values are about supporting citizens who want democracy and stability. And those interests are about Europe having safe, stable, and predictable neighbors.

Failure to uphold values and interests and an inability to unite over Russia will cost European governments dearly.

For one thing, the longer the instability in Ukraine continues, the more difficult it will be for Poroshenko to introduce reforms. Of course, this suits Putin. The last thing he wants to see is a prosperous, democratic, and Western-oriented Ukraine. Instead of recognizing the benefits of having such a neighbor, he sees and fears contagion.

But a weak, corrupt, and dysfunctional Ukraine is not in Europe’s interests. Those are the very characteristics that the pro-democracy demonstrations on Kiev’s Maidan in February wanted to get rid of, once and for all.

With EU assistance, Ukraine’s new civil society wants to push ahead with reforms. Otherwise, their own efforts in ousting former president Viktor Yanukoych and last month’s signing of an association agreement with the EU will have been squandered. For reforms in Ukraine to succeed, tougher sanctions on Russia must be applied.