• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Western Europe",
    "Germany"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Poland’s Foreign Policy Needs More, Not Less, Germany

The Ukraine crisis shows that Poland’s special foreign policy toward its Eastern neighbors is needed more than ever—together with support from Berlin.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Nov 10, 2014
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

Over the past few days, the spotlight in Europe has been on the collapse of the Berlin Wall in November 1989. Reams have been written about whether the reunited Germany now has a foreign policy commensurate with its economic size and political influence in Europe.

The focus on Berlin is understandable. But what is more fascinating is to see how, since 1989, Poland has become one of the few European countries to have developed a distinct and long-term strategy toward its Eastern neighbors.

That strategy has become so consistent that it has helped change many EU member states’ perceptions of Eastern Europe. Today, Poland’s approach is needed more than ever—with Germany’s support.

Poland rediscovered foreign policy almost immediately after it emerged from Communism in 1989. The country’s then foreign minister Krzysztof Skubiszewski, leaders of the Solidarity trade union movement, and the new head of the successor to the Communist party, Aleksander Kwaśniewski, wasted no time in reaching out to Ukraine.

That in itself was remarkable given Poland’s history and location in this part of Europe. Before and during World War II, Poland and Ukraine suffered hugely at the hands of Nazis and the Red Army. The Holocaust and the violent ethnic wars between Ukraine and Poland and throughout the region ended centuries of mixed communities, religions, cultures, and languages in these borderlands of Europe.

World War II brutally changed Poland’s borders. Half of the country’s prewar territory was lost to the Soviet Union in 1939. Later, in 1945, a third was gained from Germany. Hardly anything remained of Poland’s previously rich cultural mosaic.

After 1989, instead of using nationalism and the politics of revenge to seek redress for lost territories, Warsaw sought reconciliation with its Eastern neighbors. It reached out to Ukraine, Lithuania, and Belarus.

Such overtures took place when it was still unclear how Moscow would react to these countries breaking away from the Soviet Union. Despite the uncertainty of those months, Solidarity leaders and Skubiszewski traveled to Moscow and Vilnius, Minsk and Kiev. They were determined to convince Poland’s neighbors that Warsaw would accept existing borders and respect the rights of the minorities on both sides.

#Poland's approach toward Eastern Europe is needed more than ever.
 
Tweet This

It was, however, Poland’s policy of supporting Ukraine’s independence that has proved the most enduring and important. No matter which government was in power in Poland, Warsaw has pursued a policy based on building strong and democratic countries in its Eastern neighborhood.

That became even more imperative when Poland joined the European Union in 2004. Poland did not want that enlargement to create new divisions between the EU and Eastern Europe. Once inside the EU, Warsaw used the opportunity to put the Eastern neighborhood high on the EU’s agenda.

Poland’s reconciliation and openness toward its non-Eastern neighbors was matched with practical measures. Poland has invested heavily in helping to support reformers in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine with practical advice. It supports Belsat TV, which broadcasts from Warsaw into Belarus. It supports young Belarusians who want to study in Poland.

All the time, Poland did not ignore Russia. Poland’s former prime minister Donald Tusk and former foreign minister Radek Sikorski made every effort to build a new relationship with Russia, with some success—until the Ukraine crisis.

Despite the frustrations of Poland’s top diplomats over Ukraine’s squandered revolutions, Warsaw has steadfastly believed in and supported a Ukraine anchored to the West. Indeed, Russia’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014 and its blatant military backing of the pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine has convinced Poland that the EU should not turn its back on Eastern Europe.

That is why Poland needs more than ever the support of Germany to help bring Eastern Europe closer to the EU.

There is no doubt that over the past few years, political, trade, social, and cultural relations between Berlin and Warsaw have blossomed. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Tusk, who resigned as prime minister to become the first Polish president of the European Council on December 1, forged a warm friendship.

Warsaw and Berlin, along with Paris, worked closely together after last November’s failed Eastern Partnership summit in Vilnius, where then Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych turned down a political and economic Association Agreement with the EU.

That decision sparked antigovernment and pro-Western demonstrations in Kiev and other Ukrainian cities. Yanukovych was ousted from power, which led Russian President Vladimir Putin to annex Crimea and turn parts of eastern Ukraine into a frozen conflict.

#Poland knows that to falter now on #Ukraine would mean a new Iron Curtain.
 
Tweet This

Poland knows that to falter now on Ukraine would mean exactly what Warsaw has long feared: a new Iron Curtain.

“We do not want to see a repeat of the Cold War; we do not want a new Iron Curtain – even if moved to the Bug or Dnieper rivers. Europe deserves peace in the 21st century and should avoid making the same mistakes as in the 20th century,” Poland’s new foreign minister, Grzegorz Schetyna, said in a speech to the Polish parliament on November 6.

Yet for all the closeness between Warsaw and Berlin, Polish diplomats say they have been sidelined over the Ukraine crisis. This is because the so-called “Normandy format,” which consists of the French, German, Russian, and Ukrainian leaders, now deals with Ukraine.

The format hasn’t yielded much—indeed, there are reports of Russia sending more military equipment to eastern Ukraine. It is Berlin that is the most important player in the Ukraine crisis.

That is all the more reason for Berlin not to marginalize Warsaw. Poland’s long-held belief in anchoring Eastern Europe to the West needs Germany’s political weight and economic influence. Berlin also needs Warsaw as a partner. Like Germany, Poland has set great store by reconciliation with its neighbors. Those efforts should not be wasted.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyEuropeEastern EuropeWestern EuropeGermany

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

    Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?

    France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.