Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"Western Europe",
"France"
],
"topics": [
"EU"
]
}Source: Getty
Macron’s Bid to Wake Up Europe
The outcome of the European Parliament elections will be decisive for the EU’s future.
Emmanuel Macron has given several big speeches since become president nearly two years ago. They have homed in on two major issues: Europe’s future and how that future will be influenced by France and Germany working together.
His latest speech—it’s in fact an opinion piece published in several newspapers across the EU addressing the citizens of Europe—makes no mention of Germany or that special relationship, which over the years had driven the European project. It’s as if Macron has lost any hope in Chancellor Angela Merkel helping him pull Europe out of its deep malaise and lack of self-confidence.
Instead, without mincing his words, Macron spells out the danger of Brexit, the danger of scare mongers, and the danger of fake news that “promises anything and everything.” For Macron, Brexit symbolizes the crisis of Europe. “Never, since the Second World War, has Europe been as essential,” he said. “Yet never has Europe been in so much danger.”This danger is the trap of the status quo and resignation. This sense of malaise has allowed nationalists to sow divisions and encourage isolation. Macron doesn’t pull his punches about the Brexit trap. “The trap is in the lie and irresponsibility that can destroy [the European Union],” he said. “Who told the British people the truth about their post-Brexit future?” Macron asks rhetorically. He might as well have asked which EU leader apart from him recognizes the fragility of the European project and the need to fix it.
And because Europe is so fragile and may become even more so after the European Parliament elections, Macron has proposed a “renewal” of the bloc in three ways: defending its freedom, protecting the continent, and moving the EU much more toward convergence.
He has no doubt about how the European model of democratic freedom is being undermined by foreign powers who “seek to influence our vote at each election.” Macron proposes a European Agency for the Protection of Democracies (another agency) that will provide each member state with experts to protect their election process against cyberattacks and manipulation. In addition, funding of political parties by foreign powers should be banned. There should also be rules to ban on the internet all incitements to hate and violence.
Macron also proposes reforming the Schengen area. He’s right to say that citizens need to feel they are protected and safe. With a swipe at countries such as Hungary that are part of Schengen but have their own rules about how it functions, Macron wants stricter border controls, solidarity that entails one asylum policy with the same acceptance and refusal rules, and a common border force along with a European asylum office (yet another agency). Finally, without going into detail, Macron wants a European Council for Internal Security.
Linked to this is his call for a treaty on defense and security that would define the EU’s obligations with NATO. Macron proposes a “truly operational mutual defense clause” (in order words, the equivalent of NATO’s Article 5). And along with the European Security Council, he wants the UK on board to prepared collective decisions. No mention of a European army this time round.
He also links security and borders to fair competition. With China in mind, he asks “what power in the world would accept continued trade with those who respect none of the rules?” Macron proposes a reform of the EU’s competition policy. For him, this is about protecting Europe’s strategic industries. It is also about the EU rethinking its merger policy, something that Paris and Berlin have lobbied for as recently shown by the failed attempts by both France and Germany to merge Alstom’s and Siemens’ rail operations.
On social rights, Macron proposes a “social shield” for all workers, guaranteeing the same pay in the same workplace and a minimum wage appropriate to each country and discussed collectively every year.
To cap it all, by the end of 2019, the French president wants a Conference for Europe that would define “a roadmap” (that dreaded word) for the EU. Yes, he acknowledges, there will be disagreements. But Macron insists that it’s better to have a Europe that advances, sometimes at different speeds and that is open to all, rather than have a static Europe. Non-eurozone member states aren’t going to like that idea.
That aside, his hope is that the conference will be the impetus for a “renewed” Europe in which, he says, “the peoples will really take back control of their future. In this Europe, the United Kingdom, I am sure, will find its true place.” Watch this space.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is SayingCommentary
- Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European PopulistsCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing ItCommentary
Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.
Rym Momtaz
- Win or Lose, Orbán Has Broken Hungary’s DemocracyCommentary
Hungarians head to the polls on April 12 for an election of national and European consequence. Three different outcomes are on the cards, each with their own implications for the EU.
Zsuzsanna Szelényi
- Is France Shifting Rightward?Commentary
The far right failed to win big in France’s municipal elections. But that’s not good news for the country’s left wing, which remained disunited while the broader right consolidated its momentum ahead of the 2027 presidential race.
Catherine Fieschi
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Time to Merge the Commission and EEASCommentary
The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.
Stefan Lehne