• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: New Proposal Urges U.S. to Open Markets to the Poorest Countries

Link Copied
Published on Jul 11, 2006

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 11, 2006
CONTACT: Jennifer Linker, jlinker@carnegieendowment.org, 202/365-1490

In a new Policy Outlook, Nickel and Diming the Poor: U.S. Implementation of the LDC Initiative, Carnegie Associate Viji Rangaswami argues that the U.S. should provide open access for least developed country (LDC) exports, which would yield real benefits to the global poor and allow the U.S. to reclaim its leadership position in the struggling WTO Doha round. Rangaswami outlines the issues and interests at stake and offers a proposal to provide the poorest countries open access while addressing U.S. policymakers’ concerns. Click here to read.

The Doha Round promised to focus on development and had explicit commitments to promote the development interests of least developed or poorest countries. Any realistic outcome of the round, however, will only produce marginal gains—in some cases losses—for the poorest countries. Rangaswami argues that such a result is not only unacceptable but also avoidable. At the December 2005 WTO meeting, wealthy countries agreed to open their markets to poor country exports by eliminating tariffs and quotas, a move that would dramatically alter the outcome of the round for the global poor by producing tangible gains for countries like Bangladesh, Cambodia, Malawi and Tanzania.

The current U.S. position on access for the poorest countries jeopardizes these potential gains says Rangaswami. The United States sought the right to exclude up to three percent of poor country exports from the open access commitment in order to shield its textile and sugar producers. 

Rangaswami urges U.S. policymakers to reconsider their position. She offers four recommendations on how the United States should open its market to the poor. She also analyzes the prospects for action by the U.S. Congress, and argues that broad based congressional support can be found. Rangaswami emphasizes that it is time for U.S. policymakers to work across aisles to defeat narrow interests seeking to exclude the products of greatest importance to the poorest countries.  

Direct link to pdf: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/Rangaswami_formatted.pdf

Viji Rangaswami is an associate in the Trade, Equity, and Development Project at the Carnegie Endowment. She was formerly minority trade counsel to the Committee on the Ways and Means in the U.S. House of Representatives. Her work focuses on how multilateral and regional trade agreements, as well as unilateral preference programs, can promote development particularly among the least developed countries.

www.CarnegieEndowment.org/trade
 
Press Contact:
Jennifer Linker,
jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org, +1 202/939-2372
###

EconomyTrade

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • leaders sitting in chairs speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    As Rubio Lands in India, the U.S.-India Relationship Is Stronger Than It Looks

    Despite public disputes over trade and immigration, the strategic partnership’s foundations remain sturdy.

      • Sameer Lalwani

      Sameer Lalwani

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a France Problem?

    With its public finances in shambles, the far right polling at 35 percent ahead of the 2027 presidential election, and a growing protest movement, is France’s crisis a threat to the EU’s geopolitical awakening?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?

    Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic Capacity

    Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How the EU’s Single Market Could Unlock Enlargement

    Much has been said of the changes Brussels is trying to make to the EU enlargement process. Here’s why gradual integration might—or might not—be the answer.

      Dimitar Bechev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.