• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: New Proposal Urges U.S. to Open Markets to the Poorest Countries

Link Copied
Published on Jul 11, 2006

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 11, 2006
CONTACT: Jennifer Linker, jlinker@carnegieendowment.org, 202/365-1490

In a new Policy Outlook, Nickel and Diming the Poor: U.S. Implementation of the LDC Initiative, Carnegie Associate Viji Rangaswami argues that the U.S. should provide open access for least developed country (LDC) exports, which would yield real benefits to the global poor and allow the U.S. to reclaim its leadership position in the struggling WTO Doha round. Rangaswami outlines the issues and interests at stake and offers a proposal to provide the poorest countries open access while addressing U.S. policymakers’ concerns. Click here to read.

The Doha Round promised to focus on development and had explicit commitments to promote the development interests of least developed or poorest countries. Any realistic outcome of the round, however, will only produce marginal gains—in some cases losses—for the poorest countries. Rangaswami argues that such a result is not only unacceptable but also avoidable. At the December 2005 WTO meeting, wealthy countries agreed to open their markets to poor country exports by eliminating tariffs and quotas, a move that would dramatically alter the outcome of the round for the global poor by producing tangible gains for countries like Bangladesh, Cambodia, Malawi and Tanzania.

The current U.S. position on access for the poorest countries jeopardizes these potential gains says Rangaswami. The United States sought the right to exclude up to three percent of poor country exports from the open access commitment in order to shield its textile and sugar producers. 

Rangaswami urges U.S. policymakers to reconsider their position. She offers four recommendations on how the United States should open its market to the poor. She also analyzes the prospects for action by the U.S. Congress, and argues that broad based congressional support can be found. Rangaswami emphasizes that it is time for U.S. policymakers to work across aisles to defeat narrow interests seeking to exclude the products of greatest importance to the poorest countries.  

Direct link to pdf: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/Rangaswami_formatted.pdf

Viji Rangaswami is an associate in the Trade, Equity, and Development Project at the Carnegie Endowment. She was formerly minority trade counsel to the Committee on the Ways and Means in the U.S. House of Representatives. Her work focuses on how multilateral and regional trade agreements, as well as unilateral preference programs, can promote development particularly among the least developed countries.

www.CarnegieEndowment.org/trade
 
Press Contact:
Jennifer Linker,
jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org, +1 202/939-2372
###

EconomyTrade

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • wide shot of the city of Dakar by the water
    Commentary
    Senegal: An Island of Resilience

    During our visit, we observed a democracy that has learned from its difficult past and is working toward an even more dynamic future.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Natalie Triche

  • Article
    Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio Politics

    “Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.

      Jennifer B. Murtazashvili

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Russia, Private Companies Have Been Left to Pick Up the Tab for Ukrainian Drone Attacks

    The cost of air defense has become an unregistered tax on revenue for businesses. While military rents are consolidated in the federal budget, the costs of defense are being spread across the balance sheets of companies and regional governments.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • San Francisco Skyline
    Paper
    California’s Global Trade Cities: Driving Local and National Outcomes

    Cities across the United States facilitate investment in American communities. Yet, because global attention remains focused on U.S. trade policy, their distinctive and bold local approaches to international trade and investment promotion are often underappreciated.

      • Wyatt Frank
      • Marissa Jordan

      Wyatt Frank, Marissa Jordan

  • Trump and others walking down a red carpet, with Air Force One in the background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    “China Doesn’t Do Anything for Free”

    Why the outcomes of the U.S.-China meetings may be limited.


      Aaron David Miller, David Rennie

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.