In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.
Damien Ma
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Minister Xie Zhenhua, vice chairman of China’s National Development and Reform Commission and China’s top climate negotiator, signaled the Chinese government’s willingness to work with the United States on reducing both countries’ greenhouse gas emissions.
WASHINGTON, Mar 20—Minister Xie Zhenhua, vice chairman of China’s National Development and Reform Commission and China’s top climate negotiator, signaled Wednesday the Chinese government’s willingness to work with the United States on reducing both countries’ greenhouse gas emissions in a speech at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Washington office. Earlier this week, Minister Xie met privately with members of the Obama administration’s energy-climate team to explore possibilities for additional U.S.–China cooperation.
Minister Xie’s visit follows more than a year of off-the-record, Track II, U.S.–China negotiations, facilitated by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Global Environmental Institute of Beijing (GEI), and aimed at improving U.S.–China cooperation on energy and climate issues.
Speaking publicly at the Endowment’s Washington offices on March 18, Minister Xie thanked GEI and Carnegie for their efforts in promoting China–U.S. dialogue on climate change, and he highlighted the importance of cooperation:
"Taking active measures to address climate change is in the interest of all mankind, and it requires the cooperation of all countries. As the largest developing country and the largest developed country in the world, respectively, China and the United States having a dialogue and strengthening cooperation on the issue of climate change are inevitable in history. China and the U.S. conducting dialogue and pragmatic cooperation on climate change will benefit not only the relations of the two countries, but also international cooperation and actions to address climate change."
Jessica T. Mathews, president of the Carnegie Endowment, said:
“U.S.–China cooperation is absolutely crucial to a global climate deal. We are hopeful that a presidential level agreement on U.S.–China climate cooperation will be reached soon. What has been missing until now is not the “what” to do, but the “how” to move ahead. The Track II talks have identified areas of mutual agreement. Following through is a historic opportunity—which the governments must not miss.”
Leadership in the Track II talks was provided by Carnegie scholars in Washington led by William Chandler, director of the Endowment’s Energy and Climate program, and by GEI, an independent Chinese non-governmental organization led by Jin Jiaman.
Jin said:
“Both Chinese and American participants agree that climate change threatens our countries. We expect the Chinese and American governments to take serious action to reduce emissions.”
Following the public session, Carnegie hosted a meeting between Minister Xie and American foundation heads to further initiatives in U.S.–China climate cooperation at the nongovernmental organization level. These efforts are supported by the blue moon fund and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. “We believe that action is urgently needed to speed emissions mitigation,” said Diane Edgerton Miller of the blue moon fund, [and] “we have been investing in this goal for some time.” Lin Jiang, representing the Energy Foundation, noted that his organization has been contributing to energy efficiency and renewable energy efforts in China for a decade.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.
Damien Ma
Japan’s response to U.S. pressure over Hormuz highlights a broader dilemma: How to preserve the alliance while remaining bound by legal limits, public opinion, and an Asia-centered security agenda. Tokyo gained diplomatic space through an alliance-embracing strategy, but only under conditions that may not endure.
Ryo Sahashi
U.S. agreements must contend with national data protection laws to make durable foreign policy instruments.
Jane Munga, Rose Mosero
The simple conclusion is that the scheme will bring neither peace nor prosperity, but will institutionalize devastation.
Nathan J. Brown
A conflict launched in the name of American security is producing the opposite effect.
Sarah Yerkes