Competing Views on Combating Terrorism

{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Military"
  ]
}

In The Media

Competing Views on Combating Terrorism

Guantanamo remains the most powerful recruiting tool terrorists have, and though closing the facility poses numerous challenges, it is vital for U.S. national security.

Published on May 24, 2009

Source: VOA Encounter

As the Obama administration formulates a step-by-step plan to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, religiously-based rehabilitation programs used by Singapore and other countries could offer a solution for detainees who can be neither charged nor tried and will thus have to be released. In his May 21 national security speech, President Obama outlined the rationale for closing Guantanamo and preliminary steps toward that goal, responding to criticism from former Vice President Cheney and others that his decision to ban enhanced interrogation techniques and close Guantanamo within a year endanger American security.

In an interview with Voice of America's Carol Castiel, Will Dobson cautions that Guantanamo remains the most powerful recruiting tool terrorists have, and though closing the facility poses numerous challenges, it is vital for U.S. national security. The president’s speech also highlighted the difficulties of translating broad policy shifts into concrete action; each detainee’s case poses unique legal and logistical questions, and despite Congressional opposition, some detainees will have to be transferred to U.S. prisons.

Political Reform Security Military North America United States Middle East

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Article
A Kenya Technology Prosperity Deal Could Help Washington Secure Durable AI Partnerships with Africa
To carry out its global AI agenda, Washington will need strategic relationships with emerging markets in Africa, starting with Kenya.
Jane Munga
Commentary
Strategic Europe
Europe Needs a Strategy for its Turn to New Defense Tech
Defense tech innovations will be at the heart of Europe’s new security strategy. But so far, Brussels has been making moves without a broader plan, undermining readiness and credibility.
Raluca Csernatoni
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Multiple Wars Are Ruining Central Asia’s Efforts to Diversify Its Trade Routes
This year’s wars have made alternative routes to transit through Russia no less risky for Central Asian countries.
Galiya Ibragimova
Commentary
Emissary
The Latest Iran Deal Ignores the Lessons of the Past
By burying disagreements in imprecision, the new deal risks same fate as its predecessors.
James M. Acton
Commentary
Emissary
Iran Wanted to Survive the War. Now What?
The United States and Israel may have unwittingly revived the Islamic Republic’s “zombie regime.”
Suzanne Maloney, Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Article

A Kenya Technology Prosperity Deal Could Help Washington Secure Durable AI Partnerships with Africa

To carry out its global AI agenda, Washington will need strategic relationships with emerging markets in Africa, starting with Kenya.

Jane Munga

Commentary

Strategic Europe

Europe Needs a Strategy for its Turn to New Defense Tech

Defense tech innovations will be at the heart of Europe’s new security strategy. But so far, Brussels has been making moves without a broader plan, undermining readiness and credibility.