Dmitri Trenin
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}Source: Getty
Moscow, Washington and Nukes
The new nuclear arms reduction treaty is a positive outcome of the "reset" in U.S.-Russian relations, and will be a significant contribution to global non-proliferation efforts.
Source: NPR's On Point with Tom Ashbrook

During the negotiations, asymmetries between the two powers caused significant tension. Russia was the weaker party, but it insisted on being treated as though it were in an equal position with the United States. This is a sensitive issue for the Russian leadership, as nuclear weapons are regarded as a guarantee that the country remains strategically independent. However, Trenin points out, Russia had a tactical advantage, since it was important to U.S. President Obama to conclude the treaty before the NPT Review Conference in May 2010.
This new stage in U.S.-Russian relations affects more than nuclear disarmament negotiations. Trenin suggests that Russia is likely to agree to a new package of sanctions against Iran, even though the Russian government doubts that sanctions alone will produce significant results. He added that the Russian authorities believe that politically instable Pakistan is the greater threat to the security and the stability of the region than Iran and its nuclear ambitions.
About the Author
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
- Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet SpaceCommentary
- What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West RevealedCommentary
Dmitri Trenin
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.