Commentary
From Sudan to Ukraine, UAVs have upended warfighting tactics and become one of the most destructive weapons of conflict.
Jon Bateman, Steve Feldstein
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Southeast Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Security"
]
}
In The Media
Doug Paal on South China Sea
Countries involved in South China Sea disputes should refrain from nationalist rhetoric and focus on diplomatic negotiations that promote shared interests.
Published on Sep 20, 2012
Source: RTE News
- Vietnam’s first successful drilling for oil in disputed areas of the South China Sea fired the starting gun for conflict. China has not initiated tensions, but has reacted strongly to actions taken by its neighbors.
- Despite heated rhetoric, territorial positions are not immutable. The current “nine-dashed line” representing China’s claim changed after negotiations successfully defined the border between Chinese and Vietnamese territory.
- Uncontrolled competition for resources threatens common goals. With fishing stocks in decline, countries are more aggressively exploiting fishing areas farther afield. Disputes over energy resources do not reflect sensible economics, as overall oil and gas deposits are small or very difficult to extract.
- Tensions have been driven by national ego—a way forward is to focus on solving individual resource issues, and devising sensible, sustainable, responsible solutions for harvesting common goods.
- Countries involved, as well as the United States, should dial down language that could be perceived as counterproductive and aggressive.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Are All Wars Now Drone Wars?
- Carney’s Remarkable Message to Middle PowersCommentary
And how they can respond.
- +1
Sophia Besch, Steve Feldstein, Stewart Patrick, …
- The Greenland Episode Must Be a Lesson for Europe and NATOCommentary
They cannot return to the comforts of asymmetric reliance, dressed up as partnership.
Sophia Besch
- Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring IranCommentary
Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyCommentary
Carnegie scholars examine the crucial elements of a document that’s radically different than its predecessors.
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
