Uri Dadush
{
"authors": [
"Uri Dadush"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}Source: Getty
What Are the Biggest Challenges Facing the Next USTR?
President Obama's recently nominated his assistant and deputy national security advisor for international economics to the position of U.S. trade representative. Given the dynamic trade environment, what will be the implications?
Source: Inter-American Dialogues
Q: U.S. President Barack Obama earlier this month nominated Mike Froman to become the next United States trade representative. Froman currently serves as an assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for international economics. Will Froman have an easy confirmation in the Senate, as some people have predicted? What are the most important things Froman and his team need to accomplish in the remainder of Obama's term? How should the USTR's successes and failures be measured?
Uri Dadush, senior associate and director of the International Economics Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:
"There is little doubt that Froman is qualified for the job. He is a lawyer who has been at the center of this administration's international economic diplomacy and also worked in similar strategic support roles in the Clinton administration. He is in many ways the architect of the Obama administration's G-20 and international trade strategies. Trade partners of the United States will also see Froman as someone who has the influence to deliver on deals, if anyone can. Froman has a very tough task ahead of him, in part because he and the president have raised expectations to the sky about what American trade policy can achieve, including closing on the TPP by the end of 2013, concluding TTIP before the end of Obama's second term and also providing a big boost to American exports. This stands in stark contrast to the neglect of trade during Obama's first term. Furthermore, various parties expect the new USTR to deliver on trade facilitation at the coming Bali meeting and to make real progress on so-called 'plurilateral' agreements in services and on information technology under the aegis of the WTO. Taken together, these represent an impossibly ambitious set of agendas, especially given the lack of authority to fast track trade agreements through Congress. The persistence of the sovereign debt and currency crisis in Europe will not help either. If Froman could close on the TPP and also achieve a concrete result at Bali or its aftermath that would recover some of the WTO's lost credibility, that would be enough to place him among the more successful USTRs of recent times. Largely unnoticed, America's new trade policy, based on the TPP and TTIP mega-regional deals, represents a huge departure from the focus on multilateral deals of the last 25 years. Therefore, Froman's challenge will be to make progress on deeper and more comprehensive trade disciplines through the mega-regionals, but also bring China and other countries along in both regional discussions and at the WTO."
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.
- The Labors of TsiprasCommentary
- Greece, Complacency, and the EuroIn The Media
Uri Dadush
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East AsiaArticle
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
- Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI CompetitionArticle
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
- The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead EndCommentary
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
- The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. PowerArticle
If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.
Amr Hamzawy