• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

What Are the Biggest Challenges Facing the Next USTR?

President Obama's recently nominated his assistant and deputy national security advisor for international economics to the position of U.S. trade representative. Given the dynamic trade environment, what will be the implications?

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush
Published on May 14, 2013

Source: Inter-American Dialogues

Q: U.S. President Barack Obama earlier this month nominated Mike Froman to become the next United States trade representative. Froman currently serves as an assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for international economics. Will Froman have an easy confirmation in the Senate, as some people have predicted? What are the most important things Froman and his team need to accomplish in the remainder of Obama's term? How should the USTR's successes and failures be measured?

Uri Dadush, senior associate and director of the International Economics Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:

"There is little doubt that Froman is qualified for the job. He is a lawyer who has been at the center of this administration's international economic diplomacy and also worked in similar strategic support roles in the Clinton administration. He is in many ways the architect of the Obama administration's G-20 and international trade strategies. Trade partners of the United States will also see Froman as someone who has the influence to deliver on deals, if anyone can. Froman has a very tough task ahead of him, in part because he and the president have raised expectations to the sky about what American trade policy can achieve, including closing on the TPP by the end of 2013, concluding TTIP before the end of Obama's second term and also providing a big boost to American exports. This stands in stark contrast to the neglect of trade during Obama's first term. Furthermore, various parties expect the new USTR to deliver on trade facilitation at the coming Bali meeting and to make real progress on so-called 'plurilateral' agreements in services and on information technology under the aegis of the WTO. Taken together, these represent an impossibly ambitious set of agendas, especially given the lack of authority to fast track trade agreements through Congress. The persistence of the sovereign debt and currency crisis in Europe will not help either. If Froman could close on the TPP and also achieve a concrete result at Bali or its aftermath that would recover some of the WTO's lost credibility, that would be enough to place him among the more successful USTRs of recent times. Largely unnoticed, America's new trade policy, based on the TPP and TTIP mega-regional deals, represents a huge departure from the focus on multilateral deals of the last 25 years. Therefore, Froman's challenge will be to make progress on deeper and more comprehensive trade disciplines through the mega-regionals, but also bring China and other countries along in both regional discussions and at the WTO."

About the Author

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Labors of Tsipras

      Uri Dadush

  • In The Media
    Greece, Complacency, and the Euro

      Uri Dadush

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
EconomyTradeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in Ukraine

    The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Tourists taking photos in front of the White House on a sunny day
    Paper
    Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power

    Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

  • Close-up of Lithium-Ion Battery Pack
    Research
    Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech Policy

    A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.

      • +5

      Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    How the Israel Lobby Distorts U.S. Foreign Policy and Domestic Liberties

    In an interview, Ian Lustick and Eli Clifton discuss their new book on why a prominent ally has so much influence in America.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for China

    The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.

      Michael Pettis

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.