• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Western Europe",
    "Germany"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "EU",
    "Security",
    "Military"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Defense Minister May Become a Liability for Merkel

Angela Merkel’s long-time friend, Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière, is fighting for his political survival because of a deepening scandal over the expense of Germany’s failed effort to develop a surveillance drone.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Jun 10, 2013

Source: New York Times

This is not going to be an easy week for Chancellor Angela Merkel. Her trusted and long-time friend, Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière is fighting for his political survival because of a deepening scandal over Germany’s development of surveillance drones.

The controversy is inconvenient ahead of President Barack Obama’s visit to Berlin next week, which I discuss in my Page Two column.

The curious thing is that it is not the idea of Germany having drones that has upset the opposition parties. It is the fact that Mr. de Maizière allegedly allowed work on the project to continue at enormous cost despite the fact that the drones would never fly.

Germany had been investing in the Euro Hawk drone, a trans-Atlantic project between Northrop Grumman of the United States and the European aerospace company EADS. The drone was designed to do for the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces, what the high altitude, long endurance surveillance drone Global Hawk does for the United States military.

Last month, Mr. de Maizière acknowledged that the Euro Hawk would never fly. After spending more than €500 million, or $661 million, on the project, Germany plans to abandon it. Mr. de Maizière cited safety concerns. “Better an end with horror than a horror without end,” he told the Bundestag.

Euro Hawk cannot fly because it does not meet the standards of the European Aviation and Safety Agency. High altitude drones need sophisticated equipment that will prevent them from colliding with conventional aircraft, losing control, or becoming lost. For Germany, this would have meant spending an additional €600 million on equipment and experts, in addition to spending more for the certification.

To make things even more difficult for Mr. de Maizière, Norththrop Grumman was not prepared to provide certain technical documents for the certification process — despite the long cooperation between Norththrop Grumman, EADS and the German Defense Ministry. Mr. de Maizière said he knew nothing of the program until 2012, even though it had been under development for several years by that time.

The opposition, which is struggling in the opinion polls ahead of federal elections in September, is latching onto the drone scandal to dent Mrs. Merkel’s popularity and target her closest advisor. The longer the scandal continues the more Mrs. Merkel could be put into the uncomfortable position of taking a stand over Mr. de Maizière’s future.

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
EUSecurityMilitaryEuropeWestern EuropeGermany

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • A boat, with smoke in the background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Gulf Monarchies Are Caught Between Iran’s Desperation and the U.S.’s Recklessness

    Only collective security can protect fragile economic models.

      • Andrew Leber

      Andrew Leber

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Duqm at the Crossroads: Oman’s Strategic Port and Its Role in Vision 2040

    In a volatile Middle East, the Omani port of Duqm offers stability, neutrality, and opportunity. Could this hidden port become the ultimate safe harbor for global trade?

      Giorgio Cafiero, Samuel Ramani

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • exterior of a building with explosion damage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What We Know About Drone Use in the Iran War

    Two experts discuss how drone technology is shaping yet another conflict and what the United States can learn from Ukraine.

      Steve Feldstein, Dara Massicot

  • Forbidden City on a cloudy day
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Beijing Doesn’t Think Like Washington—and the Iran Conflict Shows Why

    Arguing that Chinese policy is hung on alliances—with imputations of obligation—misses the point. 

      Evan A. Feigenbaum

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.