Ashley J. Tellis
{
"authors": [
"Ashley J. Tellis"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India",
"East Asia",
"China",
"Taiwan"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade",
"Security",
"Military"
]
}Source: Getty
Sign a Free-Trade Deal With Taiwan
Free trade with Taiwan would secure U.S. economic interests while strengthening U.S. alliances with China’s rivals.
Source: Wall Street Journal
As President Trump pursues bilateral free-trade agreements with Japan and South Korea, one East Asian country has fallen off the radar: Taiwan. This lapse may prove economically and strategically costly for the U.S.
The Trump administration’s obsession with bilateral trade deals, rather than multilateral agreements, is controversial. But its ambitions to secure better terms of trade while deepening strategic partnerships with China’s rivals should not be. A trade deal with Taiwan would advance both objectives splendidly.
For a small, diplomatically isolated country, Taiwan plays an outsize role in global trade, especially in strategically vital sectors like communication technologies, chemicals and transportation. Taiwan is America’s 11th-largest trading partner, with two-way trade approaching $90 billion annually, according to the American Institute in Taiwan. The island nation attracted more than $24 billion in foreign direct investment from the U.S. in 2016, and it’s also America’s seventh-largest export market for agricultural goods. A free-trade agreement with Taipei would significantly expand commerce with a country that does not threaten U.S. interests.
In addition to its technological excellence, Taiwan’s strategic isolation makes it an especially attractive economic partner. The threat from China means Taiwan has a strong incentive to deepen ties to the U.S. Accordingly, it doesn’t seek preferential access to the U.S. market, as developing Asian countries often do. It merely wants stable commercial access to the U.S. to increase its growth rate and improve its political survivability. This gives the Trump administration an opportunity to negotiate a good deal, which could take effect speedily and then become a model for other agreements with Asian states.
A deal with Taiwan could also help secure U.S. and allied supply chains. Before the 1980s, many foreign producers of sensitive technologies, including South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, produced them in their home countries for direct export to the U.S. One consequence of accelerated globalization is that the production of many sophisticated electronic components, such as chip sets and optronics—which are crucial for advanced defense systems—is migrating to China.
But as Chinese assertiveness has grown, Taiwanese and Japanese companies have been looking for opportunities to shift their investments either to friendly countries or back home. A U.S.-Taiwan pact would accelerate the reorganization of Asian supply chains away from China and reduce China’s ability to coerce America and its East Asian allies in times of crisis.
Finally, a free-trade agreement would demonstrate American solidarity with Taiwan at a time when China is intensifying its efforts to deny the small island nation international representation and diplomatic ties with other countries. A deal would help limit and reverse this isolation, while also promoting U.S. prosperity and economic security. There is a big win here, waiting for the Trump administration to seize it.
This article was originally posted in the Wall Street Journal.
About the Author
Former Senior Fellow
Ashley J. Tellis was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Multipolar Dreams, Bipolar Realities: India’s Great Power FuturePaper
- India Sees Opportunity in Trump’s Global Turbulence. That Could Backfire.Commentary
Ashley J. Tellis
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.Commentary
The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.
Jeffrey Prescott
- International Demand for Russia’s Arctic Shipping Route Is Unlikely to LastCommentary
Cargo traffic through Russia’s Northern Sea Route has increased because of the disruption caused by the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and U.S.-China tensions.
Mikhail Korostikov
- How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in UkraineCommentary
The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.
Rym Momtaz
- Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech PolicyResearch
A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.
- +5
Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis