{
"authors": [
"David Linfield",
"E.J. Karmel"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Jordan"
],
"topics": []
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Since the 2016 introduction of a proportional open-list voting system to Jordan’s parliamentary elections, the Jordanian government has faced ongoing demands for reform. But the system is unconducive to democratic reform, given Jordan’s broader socio-political environment.
Former Visiting Scholar , Middle East Program
David Linfield was a visiting scholar in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where he specializes in how socioeconomic inequality is reshaping political alliances and driving new pressure for change.
E.J. Karmel
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
For settled descendants of nomadic or seminomadic communities on Jordan’s periphery, the future looks uncertain as government employment is declining, natural resources are dwindling, temperatures are rising, and traditional cross-border ties are restricted.
Armenak Tokmajyan, Laith Qerbaa
How urban and rural communities in Egypt, Morocco, and Jordan respond differently to climate change impacts and state attempts to reverse them.
Amir Gohar
The obstacles to implementation will be numerous and substantial.
Amr Hamzawy
How the events in Gaza are—and aren’t—shifting the conversation on the two-state solution.
Amr Hamzawy, Marwan Muasher
In an interview, Marwan Muasher discusses why Arab governments should have a monopoly over weapons.
Ghida Tayara