• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "Japan",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic Catastrophe

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic or financial consequences.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 20, 2011

Source: El Pais

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic CatastropheIt is as impossible not to be moved by the images of suffering and destruction in Japan as it is not to be surprised by the stoicism of the victims. Usually, the scenes following a disaster are of panic, disorder, and even looting. In Japan, we see long lines of people calmly awaiting medical attention or buying food. And faces that reflect an unimaginable pain that is seldom expressed stridently. The Japanese deserve our admiration and solidarity.

The international financial markets are also behaving at odds with what one would expect after such a disaster. They are betting that the Japanese economy recuperates sooner than the images of devastation may suggest. They also bet that the financial impact in other countries will be minor and the long-term economic effects will not be significant.

Less than one week after disaster hit Japan—with the nuclear plants still burning and the stock market in decline—international investment funds specializing in Japanese companies received record amounts of money. That week, investors deposited $956 million; the week before, the amount was a meager $180 million.

The same happened with the currency. Days after the tragedy, the yen reached its highest level since World War II. A currency this strong has very harmful effects on the country’s exports and causes multiple international imbalances. The central banks of the seven most industrialized countries intervened and were able to stabilize the yen at more reasonable levels. This, too, was unusual: central bank coordination of this kind had not happened in over a decade.

The yen had strengthened because the markets anticipated a massive repatriation of Japanese capital deposited in other countries and currencies. As this money will be needed to finance the nation’s reconstruction, demand for the yen will obviously increase. Assuming that this would raise the value of the currency, speculators rushed to buy yen. But in this case some lost their bet: the central banks’ intervention contained the yen’s appreciation.

Those who will probably not lose, however, are the investors betting on Japan’s rapid recovery. While this accident was devastating, the highest estimate of its costs is $300 million, with a majority of analysts estimating the damage at $200 million. If proven correct, this estimate represents only 4 percent of Japanese economic activity and 1 percent of the country’s wealth. Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf points out that in Japan, the world financial crisis had an impact equivalent to 10 percent of its economy, and Japan had the hardest-hit economy among the world’s richest nations. Even though the images we saw in Japan after the financial crisis were not as painful and dramatic as those we see now, the reality is that the 2009 crash affected a vastly larger number of Japanese.

Another calculation is that Japan’s recovery will be as quick as those of other major catastrophes. HSBC’s Garry Evans studied the financial impacts of the earthquakes in Kobe, Japan in 1995, Taiwan in 1999, Chile in 2010, and the September 11 terrorist attacks. He found that after an initial fall, the respective stock markets recovered to their pre-catastrophe level between 23 and 78 days afterward. One hundred days later, they were above this level. Moreover, the economies affected by these disasters grew, thanks to the stimulus sparked by the reconstruction efforts and investments. In 2010, Chile suffered from a devastating earthquake and grew 5 percent. After the Kobe earthquake, Japan’s growth rate also accelerated.

Obviously, Japan’s tragedy has other negative economic effects, many of which may not even be apparent yet. For now it is clear, for example, that global supply chains have been disrupted by the damage to Japan’s manufacturing base. This, in turn, may fuel global inflationary pressures. The insurance sector will also be hard hit, as will the nuclear energy industry. That this will be the case is another conclusion international markets seem to have reached: as the price of most other commodities has soared, that of uranium dropped 30 percent.

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic consequences.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyNuclear EnergyEast AsiaJapanNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Europe trade economy container supply chains
    Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

    As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Pashinyan surrounded by supporters while speaking to reporters
    Commentary
    Next Steps Toward Peace After the Armenian Elections

    It’s time to build momentum, and Ankara is the venue of the next opportune diplomatic window to do this.

      • Garo Paylan

      Alper Coşkun, Garo Paylan

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Security Strategy: In Search of a New Ambition

    The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Nuclear power plant reactor under construction
    Paper
    Time for Nuclear Recycling? Prospects and Implications During a Global Nuclear Energy Renewal

    Nuclear recycling has emerged as a salient, cross-cutting issue, one that is heavily dependent on broader choices among reactor designs, fuel availability, economic resources, technological options, and political choices. States and nuclear industries seeking to advance recycling must devote sustained consideration now to the interplay of all these factors.

      Etienne Pochon

  • two men sitting next to each other
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Senegal’s Debt Crisis Has Moved Its Leaders from Partners to Rivals

    The impacts of the Faye-Sonko rupture could go well beyond the country’s borders.

      • Dr. Lesley Anne Warner

      Lesley Anne Warner

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.