Commentary
Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "China Financial Markets",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Commentary
EVENT: China’s Economy After the Party Congress
Michael Pettis will be joined by Carnegie’s vice president for studies Douglas H. Paal to address economic factors challenging China and the new leadership that will emerge from the congress. Watch live on Monday, October 2.
Published on Sep 29, 2017
As China’s Nineteenth Party Congress approaches, it is important to identify the economic factors that challenge China and the new leadership that will emerge from the congress. How will the Chinese frame their policy choices? How should they? What are the implications for policymakers and business people who will deal with China over the next five years?
Michael Pettis will be joined by Carnegie’s vice president for studies Douglas H. Paal to address these questions on Monday, October 2, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. EST.
This event will be broadcast live from Carnegie in Washington, DC. Watch using the video player embedded below.
About the Author
Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- What’s New about Involution?
- Using China’s Central Government Balance Sheet to “Clean up” Local Government Debt Is a Bad IdeaCommentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.