Why Recognizing Palestine Is Essential for the Two-State Solution

{
  "authors": [
    "Marwan Muasher"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Emissary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Palestine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

A woman stands amid rubble in a bombed-out room that used to be a school classroom. — A woman stands in a former UNRWA classroom in June. (Photo by Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)

Commentary

Emissary

Why Recognizing Palestine Is Essential for the Two-State Solution

By Marwan Muasher

Published on Jun 27, 2024

In December 2000, then U.S. president Bill Clinton introduced his “parameters” to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to Palestinian and Israeli delegates at the White House. Ever since, the international community has accepted a two-state solution—a Palestinian state on the basis of the 1967 borders, in addition to an Israeli state, as the logical way to solve this enduring conflict.

But negotiations to reach that outcome have been elusive. The two-state solution depends on Israel ending its occupation of Palestinian territories, yet it continues to build settlements. Since 2000, the Israeli position has evolved from nominal acceptance of the two-state solution while working to sabotage it, to outright opposition to it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently stated that a two-state solution is a “reward for terrorism.”

By continuing to support a two-state solution while doing nothing in the past ten years to affect its implementation, the international community has essentially given Israel veto power over this path.

That is why recognition of a Palestinian state is essential. Out of 193 UN member states, 144 have done so—including most recently Ireland, Norway, and Spain. This recognition sends a strong message of support for a two-state outcome and sets an international legal marker that stands against Israel’s attempts to kill the solution and maintain the occupation indefinitely.

In the video below, Carnegie Vice President for Studies Marwan Muasher explains why increased recognition of a Palestinian state reaffirms the international community’s commitment to the two-state solution and lays a foundation for a credible political horizon that deals with the root causes of the problem: occupation.

Invalid video URL

About the Author

Marwan Muasher

Vice President for Studies

Marwan Muasher is vice president for studies at Carnegie, where he oversees research in Washington and Beirut on the Middle East. Muasher served as foreign minister (2002–2004) and deputy prime minister (2004–2005) of Jordan, and his career has spanned the areas of diplomacy, development, civil society, and communications.

Recent Work

Commentary
Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.
- Marwan Muasher
Other
Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- +18
  James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …

Foreign Policy Democracy Palestine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Emissary

Commentary
Emissary
The Iran War Is Also Now a Semiconductor Problem
The conflict is exposing the deep energy vulnerabilities of Korea’s chip industry.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Tim Sahay
Commentary
Emissary
When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?
The recent record of citizen uprisings in autocracies spells caution for the hope that a new wave of Iranian protests may break the regime’s hold on power.
Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
Commentary
Emissary
Who Will Be Iran’s Next Supreme Leader?
If the succession process can be carried out as Khamenei intended, it will likely bring a hardliner into power.
Eric Lob
Commentary
Emissary
Turkey Has Two Key Interests in the Iran Conflict
But to achieve either, it needs to retain Washington’s ear.
Alper Coşkun
Commentary
Emissary
Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher

More Work from Emissary

Commentary

Emissary

The Iran War Is Also Now a Semiconductor Problem

The conflict is exposing the deep energy vulnerabilities of Korea’s chip industry.

Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Tim Sahay

Heavily armed security personnel standing atop an armored vehicle

Commentary

Emissary

When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?

The recent record of citizen uprisings in autocracies spells caution for the hope that a new wave of Iranian protests may break the regime’s hold on power.