Why Recognizing Palestine Is Essential for the Two-State Solution

{
  "authors": [
    "Marwan Muasher"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Emissary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Palestine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

A woman stands amid rubble in a bombed-out room that used to be a school classroom. — A woman stands in a former UNRWA classroom in June. (Photo by Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)

Commentary

Emissary

Why Recognizing Palestine Is Essential for the Two-State Solution

By Marwan Muasher

Published on Jun 27, 2024

In December 2000, then U.S. president Bill Clinton introduced his “parameters” to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to Palestinian and Israeli delegates at the White House. Ever since, the international community has accepted a two-state solution—a Palestinian state on the basis of the 1967 borders, in addition to an Israeli state, as the logical way to solve this enduring conflict.

But negotiations to reach that outcome have been elusive. The two-state solution depends on Israel ending its occupation of Palestinian territories, yet it continues to build settlements. Since 2000, the Israeli position has evolved from nominal acceptance of the two-state solution while working to sabotage it, to outright opposition to it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently stated that a two-state solution is a “reward for terrorism.”

By continuing to support a two-state solution while doing nothing in the past ten years to affect its implementation, the international community has essentially given Israel veto power over this path.

That is why recognition of a Palestinian state is essential. Out of 193 UN member states, 144 have done so—including most recently Ireland, Norway, and Spain. This recognition sends a strong message of support for a two-state outcome and sets an international legal marker that stands against Israel’s attempts to kill the solution and maintain the occupation indefinitely.

In the video below, Carnegie Vice President for Studies Marwan Muasher explains why increased recognition of a Palestinian state reaffirms the international community’s commitment to the two-state solution and lays a foundation for a credible political horizon that deals with the root causes of the problem: occupation.

Invalid video URL

About the Author

Marwan Muasher

Vice President for Studies

Marwan Muasher is vice president for studies at Carnegie, where he oversees research in Washington and Beirut on the Middle East. Muasher served as foreign minister (2002–2004) and deputy prime minister (2004–2005) of Jordan, and his career has spanned the areas of diplomacy, development, civil society, and communications.

Recent Work

Commentary
Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.
- Marwan Muasher
Other
Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- +18
  James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …

Foreign Policy Democracy Palestine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Emissary

Commentary
Emissary
The Iran War Is Making America Less Safe
A conflict launched in the name of American security is producing the opposite effect.
Sarah Yerkes
Commentary
Emissary
Europe’s New Industrial Policy Can Learn From U.S. Mistakes
Although the IAA often differs from the IRA, European policymakers can still take note of the U.S. act’s shortcomings.
Milo McBride
Commentary
Emissary
The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran
Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.
Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller
Commentary
Emissary
The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier
The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.
Eric Lob
Commentary
Emissary
How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive Agenda
The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares

More Work from Emissary