Commentary
It’s dangerous to dismiss Washington’s shambolic diplomacy out of hand.
Eric Ciaramella
{
"authors": [
"Marwan Muasher"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Emissary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Palestine"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Democracy"
]
}
A woman stands in a former UNRWA classroom in June. (Photo by Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)
Commentary
Why Recognizing Palestine Is Essential for the Two-State Solution
Published on Jun 27, 2024
In December 2000, then U.S. president Bill Clinton introduced his “parameters” to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to Palestinian and Israeli delegates at the White House. Ever since, the international community has accepted a two-state solution—a Palestinian state on the basis of the 1967 borders, in addition to an Israeli state, as the logical way to solve this enduring conflict.
But negotiations to reach that outcome have been elusive. The two-state solution depends on Israel ending its occupation of Palestinian territories, yet it continues to build settlements. Since 2000, the Israeli position has evolved from nominal acceptance of the two-state solution while working to sabotage it, to outright opposition to it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently stated that a two-state solution is a “reward for terrorism.”
By continuing to support a two-state solution while doing nothing in the past ten years to affect its implementation, the international community has essentially given Israel veto power over this path.
That is why recognition of a Palestinian state is essential. Out of 193 UN member states, 144 have done so—including most recently Ireland, Norway, and Spain. This recognition sends a strong message of support for a two-state outcome and sets an international legal marker that stands against Israel’s attempts to kill the solution and maintain the occupation indefinitely.
In the video below, Carnegie Vice President for Studies Marwan Muasher explains why increased recognition of a Palestinian state reaffirms the international community’s commitment to the two-state solution and lays a foundation for a credible political horizon that deals with the root causes of the problem: occupation.
Invalid video URL
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Emissary
- What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal?
- The Trump-Modi Trade Deal Won’t Magically Restore U.S.-India TrustCommentary
Washington and New Delhi should be proud of their putative deal. But international politics isn’t the domain of unicorns and leprechauns, and collateral damage can’t simply be wished away.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
- Federal Accountability and the Power of the States in a Changing AmericaCommentary
What happens next can lessen the damage or compound it.
Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar
- The United States Should Apply the Arab Spring’s Lessons to Its Iran ResponseCommentary
The uprisings showed that foreign military intervention rarely produced democratic breakthroughs.
Amr Hamzawy, Sarah Yerkes
- Trump Wants “Peace Through Construction.” There’s One Place It Could Actually Work.Commentary
An Armenia-Azerbaijan settlement may be the only realistic test case for making glossy promises a reality.
Garo Paylan
