• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Lora Saalman"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China’s Foreign Relations",
    "U.S.-China Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Arms Control"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie China

China, the United States, and Iran

Iran’s position as major oil exporter to China affects the way Beijing perceives the Iranian nuclear crisis. However, energy security is also a factor prompting Beijing to move closer to the United States on this issue.

Link Copied
By Lora Saalman
Published on Feb 12, 2012

Source: Phoenix TV

Speaking in Chinese on the Phoenix television program Yihu yidu tan (Tiger Talk), Carnegie’s Lora Saalman explained that because of the dual-use nature of nuclear technology, the United States is concerned about Iran’s intentions and its capacity to build a nuclear weapon. Saalman maintained that U.S. military deployment in the Persian Gulf is, in part, a reaction to this threat, aimed at demonstrating U.S. conventional deterrence capabilities and commitment in the region. While this deployment plays a function in reassuring Israel, it does not necessarily mean that the United States intends to use force against Iran. Had the United States made the decision to use military means to resolve the Iranian nuclear dispute, Saalman added, it would likely already have done so. 

Instead, she noted the United States is trying to utilize diplomatic means and negotiations first. Despite reports coming out of Iran, the Unites States government has been focused on exercising restraint and avoiding war.  Saalman maintained that the statement of U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta best frames this approach, as he maintained that Iran has not yet made the decision to develop a nuclear weapon. Ultimately, Washington wants to avoid the mistakes it made in 2003 with the Iraq nuclear issue. 

Saalman asserted that given China’s independent foreign policy, it is difficult for the United States to lobby China to converge with U.S. perspectives on the region. However, China has its own reasons for keeping its distance from Iran as it tries to diversify its oil imports and minimize exposure to destabilizing trends. From this perspective, the United Staets and China at times have converging interests that could serve as the basis of cooperation. Overall, China’s chief role is likely to be serving as an intermediary to facilitate the negotiation effort.
 

About the Author

Lora Saalman

Former Nonresident Associate, Nuclear Policy Program

Saalman was a nonresident associate in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her research focuses on China’s nuclear and strategic policies toward India, Russia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Balancing Chinese Interests on North Korea and Iran

      Lora Saalman

  • In The Media
    Why Beijing Stands by Pyongyang

      Lora Saalman

Lora Saalman
Former Nonresident Associate, Nuclear Policy Program
Lora Saalman
SecurityArms Control

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Fog of AI War

    In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.

      Raluca Csernatoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?

    Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Research
    Planetary vs International Security: Economic Growth at the Crossroads

    Economic growth is at the heart of a dilemma between planetary and international security.

      Olivia Lazard

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.