Carnegie's William Chandler argues that reforming China’s financial sector can curb China’s greenhouse gas emissions even as work continues on an international treaty. China’s impressive national policies to promote clean and renewable energy have been undermined by unnecessary financial hurdles and bureaucratic struggles that increase financial risks and costs for potential investors.
As delegates in Bali struggle to agree on a climate change treaty, a new report from the Carnegie Endowment argues that reforming China’s financial sector can curb China’s greenhouse gas emissions even as work continues on an international treaty. China’s impressive national policies to promote clean and renewable energy have been undermined by unnecessary financial hurdles and bureaucratic struggles that increase financial risks and costs for potential investors.
In Financing Energy Efficiency in China, leading climate expert and Carnegie Senior Associate William Chandler argues that restrictions on debt financing and foreign equity investment, unfavorable tax policies, and even the United Nations’ emissions trading system all discourage foreign investment in clean energy in China.
Chandler concludes that to encourage investment in clean energy, China should:
Exempt clean energy investments from foreign exchange, foreign-invested enterprise, and industrial policy controls
provide tax exemptions for clean energy companies and services—particularly in regards to the value added tax (VAT), which sucks up 17 percent of total revenues
make risk-based clean energy lending more worthwhile for banks
provide loan guarantees for energy-efficiency projects in China
reduce required paperwork for clean energy investment; and
address restrictions created through the emissions trading system that actually increase risk to investors.
“Removing barriers to clean energy investment in China is an essential step toward climate protection. The incentives and rules of a global climate treaty will be blunted and frustrated by distortions of the world’s largest potential clean energy marketplace unless policy makers recognize and deal with the realities of that market,” argues Chandler.
Click on the links above for the full text of this Carnegie report.
About the Authors William Chandler is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment and director of Energy and Climate Program. Chandler has spent over 35 years working in energy and environmental policy and was a lead author for the Nobel Prize winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He is president of Transition Energy, co-founder of DEED China, and founder and former director of Advanced International Studies at the Joint Global Change Research Institute. Chandler received the 1992 Champion of Energy-Efficiency Award from the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy for his work. In 1999, he received the first Global Climate Leadership Award from the International Energy Agency. He has authored or co-authored ten books which have been favorably reviewed by scholarly and popular critics and translated into several foreign languages.
Holly Gwin is general counsel and co-founder of Transition Energy. Gwin served six years in the Clinton administration as general counsel and staff director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, where she reported directly to the President’s science advisor. She also worked as staff director of the President’s Commission on Gulf War Veteran’s Illnesses, and previously served as General Counsel of the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Gwin has published widely in science policy. She holds a law degree from the University of Tennessee and is a member of the District of Columbia Bar.
Former Adjunct Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program
Chandler is a leading expert on energy and climate. As an adjunct senior associate in the Energy and Climate Program he supports Carnegie’s work in these fields, collaborating closely on projects with Carnegie’s offices in Moscow, Beijing, Brussels, and Beirut.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.
Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?
The U.S.-Iran war has crossed a dangerous threshold: water infrastructure in the Gulf is now a target. Ecological statecraft is no longer peripheral to security, it's part of its foundations.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global energy crisis, but Europe is stuck in reaction mode. Without more strategic foresight, the EU will remain dependent on fossil fuels and will never be truly secure.
Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.