• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Uday Bhaksar"
  ],
  "type": "event",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}
Event

Ten Years After Pokhran II: Nuclear Stability in Southern Asia

Mon, May 12th, 2008

Link Copied
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

IMGXYZ898IMGZYX Reflecting on the ten year anniversary of India’s Pokhran II nuclear tests, retired Indian Cmde. Uday Bhaksar said that the tests have been good for security in India and in Asia. Speaking at Carnegie on May 12, Bhaksar noted that India’s tests, which followed Pakistan's, transformed those two nations’ programs from covert to nascent overt capabilities, a situation he said is better for stability.

Pokhran II also transformed India’s position with regard to China. From 1964 until May of 1998, China’s nuclear arsenal created a regional imbalance. Pokhran II created mutual deterrence between India and China, which prevented the emergence of a unipolar Asia, with a dominant China at the center.

Bhaksar acknowledged that Pokhran II infuriated President Bill Clinton, and the aftermath of the tests was the nadir of U.S.-India relations. But, Bhaksar said, from that low-point the two nations were able to rebuild the relationship on more stable ground.  Pokhran II enabled the U.S. and India, seven years later, to negotiate the civilian nuclear deal, he said.

Many see the development of India’s nuclear arsenal as a failure of the nonproliferation agenda, noted Bhaksar, but he argued that India has behaved as a responsible nuclear power, and that the focus on the acquisition of nuclear weapons by states like India misses the real proliferation threats—individuals like A.Q. Khan and non-state actors. Bhaksar suggested elliminating the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) in favor of a modern agreement that addresses the challenges of the twenty-first century.

South AsiaIndiaNuclear PolicyNuclear Energy

Event Speaker

Uday Bhaksar

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Event Speaker

Uday Bhaksar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.