experts
David Rothkopf
Visiting Scholar

about


David Rothkopf is no longer with the Carnegie Endowment.

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group. 

A prolific writer, Rothkopf is the author of more than 1,000 articles on international themes for publications that, in addition to Foreign Policy, include the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, and Foreign Affairs. His book National Insecurity: American Leadership in an Age of Fear (Public Affairs: 2015, paperback 2016) is his second major history of foreign policy and national security decisionmaking in the U.S. government. Other recent books include Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government--and the Reckoning That Lies Ahead (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012), Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008), and Running the World: The Inside Story of the National Security Council and the Architects of American Power (Public Affairs, 2005).​ His most recent book is entitled The Great Questions of Tomorrow (Simon & Schuster/TED Books, 2017).

Rothkopf is also a visiting professor of international and public affairs at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, where he also serves as the visiting director of the International Fellows Program. He is or has recently served as a member of a number of boards and advisory boards including those associated with the U.S. Institute of Peace, IREX, the Johns Hopkins/Bloomberg School of Public Affairs, the Progressive Policy Institute, and the Center for the Study of the Presidency.

Previously Rothkopf served as CEO of Garten Rothkopf, an advisory firm that was purchased by the FP Group and is now FP Analytics. He was also the founder and CEO of Intellibridge Corporation, an open source intelligence provider to government and private sector organizations, and prior to that served as managing director of Kissinger Associates, the advisory firm founded by former U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger.

Rothkopf served as deputy undersecretary of commerce for international trade policy in the Clinton administration. In this capacity, he played a central role in developing and directing the administration’s groundbreaking Big Emerging Markets Initiative. Rothkopf came to the government after founding and serving as chairman and CEO of International Media Partners, where he was editor and publisher of the CEO Magazine and Emerging Markets newspaper as well as chairman of the CEO Institute.  He is a graduate of Columbia College of Columbia University and attended the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. 


education
Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, AB, Columbia College of Columbia University Photo Credit: Chris Leaman for Foreign Policy

All work from David Rothkopf

filters
7 Results
In the Media
布什、奥巴马、特朗普怎样终结了“美国治世”

三位风格迥异的美国总统某种程度上以出人意料的和谐步调削弱了史上任何国家或帝国都不可匹敌的美国全球领导地位。

· June 27, 2017
《华盛顿邮报》
event
“科技、创新和国际事务”首届论坛
May 12, 2016

一场关于全球地缘政治格局以及技术和创新在塑造我们当今和未来世界的巨大影响的讨论。

  • +17
In the Media
一个更大的俱乐部会所

本文强调了“金砖四国”(BRICs)——巴西、俄罗斯、印度和中国这四个新兴大国在国际政治经济中所起到的越来越重要的作用。无论是在克服金融危机还是恐怖主义,还是全球变暖问题上,传统强国越来越离不开这四个新兴大国的合作。国际格局也将随之发生深刻的变革。

· November 15, 2008
《新闻周刊》
In the Media
9•11恐怖袭击是大事件,金融危机更影响深远

目前的金融危机的影响很可能将大于9·11恐怖袭击。9·11改变了美国对世界的看法,而当前的金融危机却将改变世界对美国的看法。美国政府为应对危机所付出的代价将超过伊拉克战争和阿富汗战争费用的总和。而此次金融危机也肯定比9·11事件波及到更多国家的更多人。

· October 5, 2008
《华盛顿邮报》
In the Media
现在谁在管理世界

卡内基国际和平基金会的访问学者戴维•罗斯考夫(David Rothkopf)在《华盛顿邮报》(Washington Post)上对美国目前的高层政治结构作出分析。在小布什政府的第二任期内,副总统切尼在白宫主导的外交政策时代已然结束。现在,赖斯在国务院占据优势地位,大幅提升了国务院在处理外交事务中的重要性。国家安全委员会的影响力则随之衰落。

· March 20, 2006
《华盛顿邮报》
In the Media
价值观难题: 美国和中国会遵循同样的规则吗?

理中美摩擦的基点是要明白这两国是紧密相联的,因此竞争和冲突不是解决问题的办法。如果美国认为它和中国不同的价值观意味着美国可以根据自身利益在国内外采取双重标准,那么这种想法会侵蚀美中关系的进展。相反,倘若美国坦然接受彼此依存所产生的变化,尽力保持原则一致性,那么它就有可能在美中关系发展的基础上创造更为合法自由的国际社会。

· July 10, 2005
《华盛顿邮报》
In the Media
如恐怖活动一般危险

近年来美国吸引国际直接投资的能力大量下降,布什政府却仍将全部注意力都集中在反恐战争之上,忽略了如恐怖活动一样具有巨大破坏力的经济隐患。美国政府应该重新拥有远见,将经济议题放回到最优先考虑的议程中,否则美国就是拱手送给敌人们那些他们永远不可能靠自身努力而取得的胜利。

· July 25, 2004
《华盛顿邮报》