What Washington Got Wrong About NATO Expansion in the 1990s
The United States engaged Russia on secondary matters while antagonizing it on vital issues.
- Joshua Shifrinson
Joshua Shifrinson is an associate professor of international policy with the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy and a nonresident senior fellow with the Cato Institute’s Defense and Foreign Policy program. A graduate of Brandeis University and MIT, he is the author of Rising Titans, Falling Giants: How Great Powers Exploit Power Shifts and co-editor (with Jim Goldgeier) of Evaluating NATO Enlargement: From Cold War Victory to the Russia-Ukraine War.
The United States engaged Russia on secondary matters while antagonizing it on vital issues.
Advocating for Kyiv’s membership doesn’t make sense without addressing Article V guarantee credibility.
Members’ interests don’t outweigh the risks.