The United States has much to offer the countries of the Arab Spring but, as the case of Pakistan shows, there are clear limits to U.S. power and abilities.
This person is no longer with the Carnegie Endowment.
Nancy Birdsall was formerly at the Carnegie Endowment in the economic reform project. She is now at the Center for Global Development, 202-328-9000.
Previously, Ms. Birdsall was executive vice president at the Inter-American Development Bank, where she served as the president’s deputy in the management of the bank’s operations and administration and as chair of the loan committee responsible for country programs and all public and private lending operations.
Ms. Birdsall has also held various policy and management positions at the World Bank, including director of the Policy Research Department, which conducted research and analysis in such areas as adjustment and growth, poverty and human resources, financial sector, trade, environment, and private sector development. She earlier served as chief of environmental operations in Latin America, and of social program operations in Brazil. In 1983 and 1984, she headed the team that prepared the World Bank’s annual World Development Report, and is the author of numerous publications on labor market, human resource, and other development issues. Her most recent work is on the relationship between income distribution and growth. Ms. Birdsall holds a doctorate in economics from Yale University and a master’s in international relations from the Johns Hopkins Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.
Publications List
The United States has much to offer the countries of the Arab Spring but, as the case of Pakistan shows, there are clear limits to U.S. power and abilities.
In order to make the most of American aid to Pakistan, Washington and Islamabad must work together to identify what kinds of development the United States does best—and what kinds it should leave to other donors.
The effect of demography on economic performance has been the subject of intense debate in economics for nearly two centuries. In recent years opinion has swung between the Malthusian views of Coale and Hoover, and the cornucopian views of Julian Simon.
Should the Multilateral Development Banks continue to lend to this group of countries or, instead, concentrate attention on poorer countries with little such access? Second, what purposes should this lending serve and under what conditions should it take place?
New Commission Report
Discussion with Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castañeda