Lessons from Korea’s political right.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}REQUIRED IMAGE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 13, 2006
Robin Wright and Anthony Shadid, reporting in today’s Washington Post, describe Bush administration plans for accelerating Iraq’s political transition. In it, they describe a key option that would establish an interim constitution by next summer, followed by the establishment of a sovereign executive to rule – allowing for sovereignty but giving time for a more successful process for writing a constitution and holding democratic elections. These ideas were first proposed in early October, in The Right Road to Sovereignty in Iraq, a policy brief by Carnegie Endowment experts Marina Ottaway and Thomas Carothers.
In the brief, they warn that early elections in postconflict situations are often dangerous. Hurried elections often do more damage than good, producing results that are rejected by some political factions or that favor radical groups over still-emergent moderate forces.
Yet because the United States decided that elections were a prerequisite for the restoration of sovereignty in Iraq, delay of the elections has not been a viable option. Ottaway and Carothers write that there is only one way to reconcile the need for a quick transfer of power with the reality that forging a new political system requires time: limit the first phase of the constitution process to writing a basic interim constitution and hold elections next year only for an interim government of national unity and for a constituent assembly.
This approach would allow the United States to quickly transfer sovereignty to an elected Iraqi government, while creating a framework for the longer-term process of political consensus-building which is necessary to establish permanent democratic institutions. The policy brief also provides comparative examples of the dangers of premature elections and outlines the specific difficulties involved in crafting a new Iraqi political system.
To contact the authors, call Cara Santos Pianesi at 202-939-2211 or Carmen MacDougall, 202-939-2319. The policy brief, along with a range of other materials on political reform in the Middle East, is available online at www.carnegieendowment.org/democracy.
Marina Ottaway is a senior associate and Thomas Carothers is senior associate and director of Carnegie’s Democracy and Rule of Law Project.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Lessons from Korea’s political right.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.
Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha
European democracy support strategy in 2025 prioritized protecting democratic norms within Europe. This signals the start of a structural recalibration of the EU’s approach to democracy support.
Richard Youngs, ed., Elena Viudes Egea, Zselyke Csaky, …
Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.
Temur Umarov
The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.
Dmitry Kuznets