• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: Understanding the Upcoming Elections in Kuwait

Link Copied
Published on Jun 22, 2006
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

For Immediate Release: June 22, 2006
Contact: Jennifer Linker, 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org

Kuwaitis will go to the polls on June 29, 2006 to determine only one matter: who will represent them in the country’s 50-member parliament. While weak by global standards, Kuwait’s parliament is the most powerful elected body on the Arabian peninsula and one of the strongest in the region. The elections have drawn little international attention, yet the poll could have deep implications for the future of the Arabian peninsula’s most democratic political system. Senior Associate Nathan Brown and Junior Fellow Dina Bishara of Carnegie’s Middle East Program elucidate the important factors in Kuwait’s elections in a new web-only commentary, Kuwaitis Vote for a New Parliament...And Maybe a New Electoral System.

Brown and Bishara argue that while this year’s voting may seem routine—other than two interruptions, Kuwait has had regular parliamentary elections since independence—the 2006 parliamentary elections have two striking features.

• First, they are occasioned by an intense controversy over the size of electoral districts—a technical matter with significant implications for Kuwaiti political life. 
• Second, in this dispute, liberals and Islamists are very much on the same side—a rare alliance in the region, and unusual even in Kuwait.

The authors examine these two anomalies and how the dispute over the size of electoral districts and suspicions about the government’s commitment to political reform led Kuwait’s emboldened opposition to take measures that led to the dissolution of parliament and the holding of early elections. 

An uneasy alliance between liberal and Islamists will attempt to redress what they regard as the single most important impediment to political reform in Kuwait. Long on the agenda of the Kuwaiti opposition, electoral reform is seen as the gateway to a serious political reform process and the prerequisite for the institution of a formal party system.

For more resources, please go to www.CarnegieEndowment.org/MiddleEast.

Nathan Brown is a senior associate in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment, and co-author of the Carnegie Paper Islamist Movements and the Democratic Process in the Arab World: Exploring Gray Zones. Dina Bishara is a junior fellow in Carnegie’s Middle East Program.

If you have received this release in error, please send a message to info@CarnegieEndowment.org
###

Political ReformDemocracyMiddle East

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-Command

    Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.

      Galiya Ibragimova

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europolis, Where Europe Ends

    A prophetic Romanian novel about a town at the mouth of the Danube carries a warning: Europe decays when it stops looking outward. In a world of increasing insularity, the EU should heed its warning.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for Russia

    For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.

      James D.J. Brown

  • Aerial shot of protesters marching down a street
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Federal Accountability and the Power of the States in a Changing America

    What happens next can lessen the damage or compound it.

      Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar

  • Stack of Iranian newspapers featuring Trump's face and a burning American flag
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The United States Should Apply the Arab Spring’s Lessons to Its Iran Response

    The uprisings showed that foreign military intervention rarely produced democratic breakthroughs.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Amr Hamzawy, Sarah Yerkes

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.