With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
{
"authors": [
"Andrew Monaghan"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Pro et Contra
This article orginally appeared in Russian in "The Power of Oil and Gas" edition of the Pro et Contra journal (Volume 10, No. 2-3, 2006), published by the Carnegie Moscow Center.
The energy sector is central to the future economic security and development of both Russia and the EU and is a central element of the EU-Russia relationship. It is a dimension that is of real importance, rather than concocted political desire. It would severely undermine the energy security of both the EU and Russia if the relationship began to drift apart in the search for superficially more reliable sources. Concerns about Russia 's reliability cannot be dismissed out of hand, but problems must be more accurately pin-pointed. It is important that the rhetoric moves away from notions of mutual “dependence” on the other and producer vs. consumer relations. The relationship is a mutual one, with benefits as well as down-sides for both.
For the full text, please click on the link above.
Andrew Monaghan
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
Amid celebrations of bilateral ties was a deeper focus on stability in the Middle East.
Amr Hamzawy
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has twice inspired praise for standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump: at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos and on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. Is Carney showing a third way better than the EU has in dealing with the Trump administration?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
Xi, Putin, and other regional leaders are back-slapping in Bishkek, but the SCO has yet to answer the most serious questions about continental Asia's economic future.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
The EU’s responses to two recent incidents expose the gulf between European perceptions and capabilities. Unless the union can bridge that gap, it will never become a real geostrategic power.
Rym Momtaz