Weighing the Impact of Iran's Uranium Program

{
  "authors": [
    "Pierre Goldschmidt"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

In The Media

Weighing the Impact of Iran's Uranium Program

By Pierre Goldschmidt

Published on Dec 11, 2007

Source: NPR's Morning Edition

The unclassified National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran, released December 3, reported that Iran ended efforts to build a nuclear weapon in 2003. Yet even if Iran has, in fact, stopped these efforts, it continues to pursue uranium enrichment and other technical capabilities that could be applied to producing nuclear weapons.

The NIE did not draw a clear distinction between the intention to develop nuclear weapons and the intention to develop a nuclear weapons capability, Carnegie's Pierre Goldschmidt says.

Click here to listen to the broadcast.

About the Author

Pierre Goldschmidt

Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Nuclear Policy Program

Goldschmidt was a nonresident senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment.

Recent Work

Article
A Realistic Approach Toward a Middle East Free of WMD
- Pierre Goldschmidt
Article
Serious Deficiencies Exposed by Latest IAEA Safeguards Implementation Report
- Pierre Goldschmidt

Middle East Iran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Article
Palestine’s Climate Change Planning Faces Its Limits
Barriers ranging from weak legal frameworks to ongoing, occupation-related limitations are constraining Palestine from achieving its ambitious climate targets.
Joy Arkeh, Nabil Nasser
Commentary
Diwan
Corrupted by Absolute Power
In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.
Michael Young
Commentary
Emissary
“China Doesn’t Do Anything for Free”
Why the outcomes of the U.S.-China meetings may be limited.

Aaron David Miller, David Rennie
Article
The Unintended Consequences of Iran’s Asymmetric Strategy and America’s AI War
The Iran war is unique in the scope and scale of asymmetric warfare and AI-enabled conflict. These will test the limits of protecting civilians.
Steve Feldstein
Commentary
Diwan
Why Does the Middle East Suffer “Forever Wars”?
Because perpetual conflict enhances control, offers economic benefits, and allows leaders to ignore popular preferences.
Angie Omar

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Article

Palestine’s Climate Change Planning Faces Its Limits

Barriers ranging from weak legal frameworks to ongoing, occupation-related limitations are constraining Palestine from achieving its ambitious climate targets.

Joy Arkeh, Nabil Nasser

Commentary

Diwan

Corrupted by Absolute Power

In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.

Michael Young

Trump and others walking down a red carpet, with Air Force One in the background

Commentary

Emissary

“China Doesn’t Do Anything for Free”

Why the outcomes of the U.S.-China meetings may be limited.

Aaron David Miller, David Rennie

A drone flies in front of an Iranian flag in southern Tehran, Iran

Article

The Unintended Consequences of Iran’s Asymmetric Strategy and America’s AI War

The Iran war is unique in the scope and scale of asymmetric warfare and AI-enabled conflict. These will test the limits of protecting civilians.

Steve Feldstein

Commentary

Diwan

Why Does the Middle East Suffer “Forever Wars”?

Because perpetual conflict enhances control, offers economic benefits, and allows leaders to ignore popular preferences.

Angie Omar