Commentary
Despite public disputes over trade and immigration, the strategic partnership’s foundations remain sturdy.
Sameer Lalwani
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"Middle East",
"Southern, Eastern, and Western Africa",
"East Asia",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Urgent Action Needed to Avoid a Global Trade War
Aggressive action is needed to address the global financial crisis, but bailing out banks and domestic industries are measures that could—if not orchestrated carefully—provoke a devastating global trade war.
Published on Mar 11, 2009
WASHINGTON, Mar 10—Aggressive action is needed to address the global financial crisis, but bailing out banks and domestic industries are measures that could—if not orchestrated carefully—provoke a devastating global trade war. International leaders at the G20 meeting on April 2 must devise a coordinated and transparent plan to re-ignite growth and avoid a resurgence of protectionism.
In a new policy outlook, Uri Dadush notes that protectionism is already on the rise: 70 percent of trade measures enacted since November 2008 restrict trade. Pressure to protect could become overwhelming as the crisis deepens, with huge potential losses.
Policy recommendations for the G20 meeting:
- Economic recovery measures—enacting stimulus plans, removing toxic assets from balance sheets, and helping the most vulnerable groups and countries—are essential but should be temporary and have a clear exit strategy.
- Sharing the burden fairly and visibly across G20 members will help defuse protectionism.
- The moratorium on new trade restrictions agreed upon at the November G20 summit should be extended through 2010.
- World Trade Organization (WTO) surveillance of national recovery measures should be unequivocally endorsed. Member states should be required to report all tariff and subsidy changes to the WTO immediately.
- Reassert a determination to conclude the Doha Round by the end of 2009.
- Form a working group to explore how to make the WTO more effective. As policy makers consider how to strengthen international financial architecture to prevent future crises, they should also strengthen the global trade regime to prevent a resurgence of protectionism in the future.
Dadush concludes:
“Though the impact of trade-restricting measures enacted so far is small, the risk of a devastating resurgence of protectionism is real. A trade war today would generate even greater losses than it did in its last surge during the Great Depression, when tariffs were much higher at the outset than they are today and countries were less integrated through complex international production chains.”
###
NOTES
- Click here for a direct link to the PDF
- Uri Dadush is director of Carnegie’s new International Economics Program. His work currently focuses on trends in the global economy and the global financial crisis. Dadush previously served as the World Bank’s director of international trade for six years and before that as director of economic policy for three years. He has also served concurrently as the director of the Bank’s world economy group over the last eleven years, leading the preparation of the Bank’s flagship reports on the international economy over that period.
- Press Contact: Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- As Rubio Lands in India, the U.S.-India Relationship Is Stronger Than It Looks
- Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a France Problem?Commentary
With its public finances in shambles, the far right polling at 35 percent ahead of the 2027 presidential election, and a growing protest movement, is France’s crisis a threat to the EU’s geopolitical awakening?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?Commentary
Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic CapacityCommentary
Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.
Balázs Jarábik
- Europe’s Tide of Citizen Assemblies: Unsung Success or Anticlimax?Article
A notable degree of participative democracy has firmly arrived in Europe. But to have more far-reaching impact, democratic deliberation needs to move into a radically new phase.
Richard Youngs
