• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Michael Pettis"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

A Long Hard Restructuring Road Ahead in China

China’s transition from an economy fueled by exports to one that relies on domestic consumption will require a transformation of its most basic economic institutions and the creation of a much larger social safety net — a process that will take many years.

Link Copied
By Michael Pettis
Published on Apr 1, 2009
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: Financial Times

A Long Hard Restructuring Road Ahead in ChinaAs a massive downward adjustment in the ability of US households to finance domestic overconsumption takes place, experts and policymakers around the world are demanding that China engineer an economic and social transition: from an export-led model of economic growth to one that relies on domestic consumption – and as swiftly as possible.

If China can kick-start growth in consumption, they argue, it will relieve pressure on other countries reeling from a drop in US and global demand.

But these demands are unrealistic. Although it is clear that the development model that served the country for so long has outlived its usefulness, it is just as clear that the move towards a new, sustainable model will take great effort and many years.

Policymakers have known for nearly a decade that the country must make the transition, but engineering it is more easily said than done.

The old export model is so entrenched in the banking system and in the growth plans pursued by provincial and central governments and state-owned enterprises that, instead of an increasing reliance on domestic consumption to power growth, over the past five years, consumption has actually declined and the trade surplus risen.

This sort of transition never occurs as a rapid and orderly shift, in which manufacturers stop shipping goods overseas and begin distributing them domestically.

In China’s case, it will require a retooling of the financial system, the creation of a much larger service sector, the establishment of a robust and credible social safety net and – most importantly – the politically difficult elimination of centralised policies that encourage manufacturing and savings and suppress consumption.

But not only are these changes unlikely to be effective in creating domestic demand except in the long term, they may easily cause a rise in unemployment in the short term.

For example, the transition to a domestic-consumption-led economy normally occurs as exporters are forced into bankruptcy and their assets and workers are freed and gradually redeployed to serving the domestic market. This already seems to be happening.

Changing Chinese consumer attitudes towards saving will require not just the creation of a wide and strong social safety net, but also that households find the system credible. This will only come to pass over several years as they test the system.

Precedents confirm the slowness and difficulty of the process. It took the 1797 Panic, when deflation in England disrupted commercial and real estate markets in North America, and two decades of tough economic conditions for the US to manage its own transition from export-led growth to domestic-consumption-led growth in the early 19th century.

Nearly 200 years later, Japan suffered a terrible banking crisis and two tough decades as it struggled to reduce its dependence on exports.

While the global crisis has accelerated the need for China to make the transition, it has also made it risky for the government to force a massive increase in bank lending and fiscal spending to counteract the impact of declining global consumption.

Given the limitations of the country’s economic model and financial system, almost any serious fiscal push is likely to increase production capacity at least as much as permanent consumption. This means that, in the short term, China might become more dependent than ever on foreign demand, but it is not at all obvious that the demand will be there.

If fiscal expansion to replace foreign demand is forced at too quick a rate, there is a serious risk that, if the global economic contraction persists for two or three more years, the country will have more overcapacity and be in a weaker fiscal and financial position.

In the past 30 years, China has gone though three distinct stages of development.

The first, which occurred mostly in the first decade, involved unshackling social and economic structures. This permitted a burst of entrepreneurial activity and an explosion in productivity growth. The second stage, which occurred mainly in the 1990s, involved a turn towards large-scale fiscal expansion, mainly through the banking system.

The third stage occurred as the world underwent rapid monetary expansion and China invested in domestic manufacturing to supply the US’s debt-fuelled consumption.

The global crisis has finally killed off the third stage. We are now in a very different world, one in which China and other developing countries can no longer rely on a seemingly infinite capacity to consume on the part of US households.

This will lead to a long and difficult restructuring of the economy. The world needs this to occur as smoothly as possible, but domestic worries about the process will inevitably trump global concerns.

About the Author

Michael Pettis

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China

Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets. 

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    What GDP Means in a Soft Budget Economy Like China

      Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis
EconomyEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Japanese troops take part in a counter-landing live fire exercise as part of the annual Balikatan joint military drills on May 04, 2026 in Laoag, Ilocos Norte province, Philippines.
    Article
    The Two Logics Driving Japan’s Security Policy

    Japan’s revision of its three strategic documents reflects an intention to keep the United States engaged in the region while Japan fills any vacuums of U.S. power to preserve the Indo-Pacific order.

      • Ryo Sahashi

      Ryo Sahashi

  • Robot arm with disposable test tube virus sampling in laboratory
    Commentary
    Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. Sanctions

    Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.

      Xue Gong

  • Two people in blue PPE standing over large metal rolls
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Inside the Global Race to Erode a Battery Manufacturing Monopoly

    Over the past decade, China has moved from marginal player to major producer of all things batteries. The United States, Europe, and others are aiming to balance the market.

      Milo McBride

  • Lee and Lula walking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Why Korea’s President Skipped Washington for Silicon Valley and Brasília

    Lee’s tour shows how Seoul is reorganizing its diplomacy away from Pyongyang and toward industrial networks and the geography of the compute economy.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • People standing on rocks in the ocean near the shore, with soldiers in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Migration Wave That Embarrassed Morocco and Rattled Europe

    Most migrants may have left Ceuta, but the effects may linger.

      • Alejandro Rodriguez
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Alejandro Martin Rodriguez, Sarah Yerkes

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.