Christopher Boucek
{
"authors": [
"Christopher Boucek"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Saudi Arabia"
],
"topics": [
"Security"
]
}Source: Getty
Internal Saudi Counter-Terrorism Measures Remain Shrouded in Mystery
Despite recent research, much remains unknown Saudi prisons, rehabilitation centers, and courtrooms.
Source: Jurist

As of March 2009 - according to the Ministry of Interior - there were approximately 4,200 people detained in Saudi Arabia on charges connected to security and terrorism. This is reportedly down from a high of somewhere around 12,000 people held at the height of the security clampdown several years ago. Saudi officials have stated that over 11,400 people have been interrogated and released. Before September 11th, 2001, there were just under 200 people held in Saudi prisons on allegations of terrorism.
Prolonged detention will continue to be a major issue in counter-terrorism, not just in Saudi Arabia but everywhere terrorists are detained. There are currently no good methods to determine when to let a security detainee out of custody. There is an urgent need to develop comprehensive risk assessment tools to evaluate security detainees prior to release. Until we have such risk assessment tools, the issue of continued detention will persist.
For the past several years, Saudi officials have discussed plans to try accused terrorists under Islamic law in open court. A total of 991 individuals were to go on trial in connection with a number of domestic terrorist attacks. In July it was announced that a special court had convicted 330 people; several suspects were also acquitted. This was the first official confirmation that the trials had commenced. Very little information has been forthcoming about the trials, procedures, or the evidence used. Since the verdicts were announced, the names, charges, and sentences of the convicted have not been released. Despite earlier assertions to the contrary, it seems that foreign observers were not permitted to attend the trials.
The report also observes that many of those that have been released through Saudi Arabia's rehabilitation program were not engaged in violence, but were sympathizers or logistics and support personnel. However, this is not necessarily a deficiency in the Saudi approach. Individuals that have participated in violence within the kingdom are not released through the Counseling Program. All of the senior experienced operational leaders in the country have either been killed or captured. Focusing on lower-level operatives has worked to prevent supporters and sympathizers from moving closer to violence and filling those gaps.
About the Author
Former Associate, Middle East Program
Boucek was an associate in the Carnegie Middle East Program where his research focused on security challenges in the Arabian Peninsula and Northern Africa.
- Yemen After Saleh’s Return and Awlaki’s ExitQ&A
- Rivals—Iran vs. Saudi ArabiaQ&A
Christopher Boucek, Karim Sadjadpour
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s WeaknessCommentary
The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.
Artyom Shraibman
- Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with ChinaPaper
After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.
Saheb Singh Chadha
- Ahead of the Ankara Summit, NATO’s Mood Has ChangedCommentary
European allies are less focused on appeasing Trump and more focused on smoothing the transition to a Europe-led alliance.
- +1
Sophia Besch, Alper Coşkun, Nate Reynolds, …
- In the Middle East and North Africa, America and China Converge More Than They DivergeArticle
Middle powers in the region will keep hedging between Washington and Beijing. It’s in the great powers’ interests to play along.
Amr Hamzawy, Kathryn Selfe
- Managing Montreux: Turkey and the Russia-Ukraine War in the Black SeaArticle
For ninety years, Turkey has been positioned as the principal gatekeeper of Black Sea security. As a result, European and NATO efforts to support Ukraine will require closer engagement with Ankara.
Thomas de Waal