• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Rachel Chan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Taiwan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

In The Media

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China Relations: Paal

The triangular relationship between the United States, Taiwan, and China is likely to continue on a stable trajectory as all sides try to avoid unnecessary friction and emphasize cooperation.

Link Copied
By Rachel Chan
Published on Oct 16, 2009
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: Central News Agency

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China RDouglas Paal, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan, said Friday in Taipei that "continuity" will characterize prospects for the short-term strategic paths of the United States, Taiwan and China.

The proposition was reinforced by last year's election of a Taiwan administration that seeks to eschew unnecessary friction with China and seek areas of cooperation with Beijing, according to Paal.

He said Taiwan has at least two and a half years to seek success with its approach, and Beijing still appears willing to cooperate, though always with a wary eye to the downside risks.

Paal, who is now vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said at the seminar titled Taipei- Washington-Beijing Relations under the Ma and Obama Administrations" that both China and the U.S. are also likely to continue their current tactics.

He said China's direction, economically and otherwise, appears to enjoy what passes for a consensus on the mainland, while the U.S., under the new Obama administration, is actively seeking to accentuate the positive with Beijing.

Obama has identified the financial crisis, climate change, and non-proliferation as his key themes and has been seeking and initially obtaining Chinese cooperation in these areas, he added.

Paal also argued that Obama would undoubtedly like to see Taiwan shoulder an appropriate share of the burden of its own necessary defense.

"Indications are that his (Obama's) administration will assess Taiwan's requests with an eye to the actual situation rather than just the statements of China's leaders," Paal said.

"The friction that could result should be manageable within the broader positive context in U.S.-China relations, and in Taiwan's own efforts to avoid clumsily treading on sensitivities and to seek common interests," he added.

In the long term, Paal said whether the U.S., Taiwan, and China will change their strategic courses will depend on three factors that include the ability of the Ma Ying-jeou administration to demonstrate to Taiwan's voters that his policies are worth continuing.

The other two factors are China's avoidance of a domestic crisis, driven by factors such as a financial collapse, a failure to stimulate domestic consumption, or an embarrassing international setback; and America's readjustment of its economic trajectory from a capital importing to a capital exporting country, the downsizing of its international exposure to conflict, and fiscal responsibility, he added.

"These are significant threats, if now remote, to the positive sum game the triangular relationship has entered. The emergence of a significant change in any one of them will have a negative impact on the other two," Paal said.

About the Author

Rachel Chan

Rachel Chan
Foreign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChinaTaiwan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Satellite in space
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. Has Weapons in Space. Now What?

    The acknowledgment has sparked fears of a new arms race with China and Russia.

      • Chris  O'Meara ​​​​

      Chris O’Meara

  • Blue Water Bridge with Flags of USA and Canada
    Paper
    What Canada Knows About American Power

    Smaller powers cannot go it alone, but Canadian history shows that integration with the United States will not always be benign.

      Paul Samson

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Stare Down China on Trade?

    The European Commissioner for Trade is headed to China. But after President Xi’s bridge-building visit to Washington, can a more isolated EU overcome Beijing’s stranglehold on critical raw materials? Who will blink first?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Trump holding a glass of champagne up in a toast, with a table of guests in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.

    The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.

      • Jeffrey Prescott

      Jeffrey Prescott

  • Article
    Separable, not Separate: Governing Europe’s Collective Defense

    European NATO countries are wrestling with the possibility of U.S. disengagement from the alliance. With the continent’s security increasingly uncertain, governments must restore the credibility of their collective defense.

      Hans-Dieter Lucas, Adam Thomson, Pierre Vimont

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.