Winning the Nobel Peace Prize

{
  "authors": [
    "Henri J. Barkey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Winning the Nobel Peace Prize

President's Obama recent Nobel Peace Prize has resulted in skepticism in some circles. His forthcoming acceptance speech offers him the opportunity to capitalize on the award and take steps toward achieving many of his administration's goals.

By Henri J. Barkey

Published on Oct 9, 2009

Source: The Brian Lehrer Show

Last week’s surprise announcement that President Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize has put enormous pressure on him. The prize, according to Henri Barkey, is a “poisoned chalice” given to Obama through a “calculated choice” by the Nobel committee. With all of the problems that Obama is facing domestically and abroad, Barkey suggests that the committee is trying to push Obama to come through on his campaign promises.

Obama’s forthcoming acceptance speech will be very important. Barkey suggests that Obama announce that he will undertake two specific projects, one concrete and the other symbolic. The first would be to announce the decommissioning of a specific number of nuclear weapons with an agreed upon deal between the US and the Russians. Second, he should announce that immediately following the speech he will fly to Jerusalem to work to bring the Israelis and Palestinians together. Barkey concludes that Obama “shouldn’t try to solve all the world’s problem," but that “he needs to capitalize” on the award in his speech.

About the Author

Henri J. Barkey

Former Visiting Scholar, Middle East Program

Barkey served as a member of the U.S. State Department Policy Planning Staff, working primarily on issues related to the Middle East, the Eastern Mediterranean, and intelligence from 1998 to 2000.

Recent Work

Article
Winners and Losers in Turkey’s Election
- Henri J. Barkey
Article
The Road to Turkey’s June Elections: Crises, Strategies, and Outcomes
- Henri J. Barkey

Foreign Policy Nuclear Policy United States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Diwan
Pushing Beirut into an Armed Conflict With Hezbollah Is Insane
The party’s domestic and regional roles have changed, so Lebanon should devise a disarmament strategy that encompasses this.
Michael Young
Article
Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio Politics
“Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.
Jennifer B. Murtazashvili
Paper
California’s Global Trade Cities: Driving Local and National Outcomes
Cities across the United States facilitate investment in American communities. Yet, because global attention remains focused on U.S. trade policy, their distinctive and bold local approaches to international trade and investment promotion are often underappreciated.
Wyatt Frank, Marissa Jordan
Commentary
The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation
The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.
Shruti Mittal
Commentary
Diwan
Corrupted by Absolute Power
In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.
Michael Young

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Diwan

Pushing Beirut into an Armed Conflict With Hezbollah Is Insane

The party’s domestic and regional roles have changed, so Lebanon should devise a disarmament strategy that encompasses this.

Michael Young

Article

Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio Politics

“Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.

Jennifer B. Murtazashvili

Paper

California’s Global Trade Cities: Driving Local and National Outcomes

Cities across the United States facilitate investment in American communities. Yet, because global attention remains focused on U.S. trade policy, their distinctive and bold local approaches to international trade and investment promotion are often underappreciated.

Wyatt Frank, Marissa Jordan

Commentary

The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation

The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.

Shruti Mittal

Commentary

Diwan

Corrupted by Absolute Power

In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.

Michael Young