Iran’s Ongoing Efforts to Gain a Foothold in the Middle East

President Ahmadinejad’s meeting with the leader of Hezbollah is further evidence of Iran’s efforts to gain a foothold in the Middle East as one of the key regional players.

published by
The Valdai Discussion Club
 on October 12, 2010

Source: The Valdai Discussion Club

Iran’s Ongoing Efforts to Gain a Foothold in the MValdaiclub.com interview with Alexey Malashenko, Member of the Research Council of the Carnegie Moscow Center, regarding Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Lebanon visit

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad plans to meet with Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Hezbollah, one of the two major political parties in Lebanon representing Shiite Muslims. Do you believe this move will aggravate even further Iran’s tense relations with the United States and Israel?
 
Ahmadinejad’s meeting with the leader of Hezbollah will not aggravate the situation, it will simply provide yet more evidence of Iran’s ongoing efforts to gain a foothold in the Middle East as one of the key regional players. He is most likely to promise Hezbollah additional support, including financial and military assistance. However, Ahmadinejad will have to bear in mind that Hezbollah is a highly influential and legitimate political force in Lebanon, and as such would surely be reluctant to take any extreme steps, something Iran often tries to goad it into. There are differences between Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad, although they are unlikely to be highlighted during this meeting.
 
What about Iran’s role, as a regional power, in mediating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – how much of an influence can Iran have on the process of building an independent Palestinian state? Can a peaceful settlement be reached without Iran’s participation in the talks?

 
Iran’s role in building a sovereign Palestinian state should not be overstated. Quite the reverse, in fact: should such a state be established, Iran’s influence would weaken. For Iran’s leadership it is the ongoing conflict that matters, the active involvement of radical Islamists. Iran looks more impressive and dramatic in confrontation than in détente.
 
How would you assess the changes in Russia’s foreign-policy paradigm regarding Iran?
 
Russia’s attitude toward Iran has changed, it has moved closer to that of the United States and Europe. The most eloquent example of this was Moscow’s backtracking on plans to sell Iran its S-300 air defense missile systems, which annoyed the Iranian leadership. Russia’s attempts to mediate in talks with Iran and prove that it is in a position to exert pressure on Ahmadinejad were unsuccessful.
 
Yet, officials in Moscow still cherish hopes for a restoration of “special relationship” with Iran – for another chance to prove that they can, in fact, pressure Iran into some concessions.

This interview originally appeared on the Valdai Discussion Club site.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.