• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Michael Pettis"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Is the World Too Dependent on the Chinese Economy?

Global growth is stimulated by increased demand, and while China is currently the largest component of global growth due to its strong economy, it is not a major net contributor to growth outside its borders.

Link Copied
By Michael Pettis
Published on Oct 30, 2010
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: The Economist

Is the World Too Dependent on the Chinese Economy?There is a lot of confusion over China’s contribution to global growth. Because China is currently the largest component of global growth—i.e. its GDP growth rate times its share of global GDP exceeds that of any other country—many analysts conclude that China is also the biggest contributor to global growth.

But what does it mean to contribute to global growth? For many years the world was balanced between countries with excess demand relative to their production of goods and services and countries with deficient demand. The 2007-09 crisis seems to have ended the period of foolish overconsumption by the US and several countries in Europe, who jointly accounted for an outsized share of global consumption growth in the previous decade. When we consider that for the next several years the largest economies in the world, the US, Europe, China, Japan, and the UK, as well as many smaller ones, will be forced to recapitalise their ailing or insolvent banking systems, and that banking systems are always cleaned up directly or indirectly by transfers from the household sector, over the next several years we should not expect a major recovery of household consumption. Long-suffering households will have too little disposable income left over from the banking sector recapitalisation to engage in a consumption spree.

So what the world really needs is more demand. In that sense countries with excess demand, or at least demand growth relative to growth in production, contribute to global growth, while countries with deficient demand convert foreign demand into domestic growth. As an economy with deficient demand and by far the world’s largest trade surplus, China is not a major net contributor to growth outside its borders. It is a major growth booster mainly for commodity producers, but it is a greater drag on growth for manufacturers.

China is eager to remedy this. It has engaged in a massive investment boom, but concerns about capital misallocation make this unsustainable. It is eager to boost domestic household consumption, but this will require a slow and difficult transformation of the country’s growth model. Over the next few years if China can rebalance its economy, and reduce its trade surplus, it will contribute real growth and employment to the rest of the world. For now, however, it is hard to argue that the global economy depends too much on China’s economic growth.
 

About the Author

Michael Pettis

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China

Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets. 

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

      Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis
EconomyEast AsiaChinaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Two men speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Who Puts Guardrails on AI?

    Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.

      Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer

  • Trump walking toward Xi, both with arms extended to shake hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. and China Need an AI Hotline. Here’s How to Build It.

    It should address the shortcomings of previous crisis communication efforts and adapt to the demands of frontier AI.

      • Lucy Luo

      Lucy Luo

  • Research
    China’s Construction of Police Training Facilities in Global South Likely to Expand Global Security Leadership

    China’s police training infrastructure construction projects provide benefits to recipient countries, promote China’s image as a major global security provider, and are likely to reinforce alignment between Beijing’s security priorities and those of countries in the Global South.

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens
      • +2

      Cameron Waltz, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Kim Nguyen, …

  • Two men sitting on a stage and speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What Would Need to Happen to Slow AI Development?

    AI capabilities are moving fast. Most institutions—including governments—can’t keep up.

      • Anton Leicht

      Anton Leicht, Scott Singer

  • hands holding semiconductors in production
    Commentary
    BIS in the New Age of Import Controls

    The Bureau of Industry and Security needs to adjust its focus and practices to maintain its position as the U.S. government’s primary champion of international technological competition.

      • Geoffrey Irving

      Geoffrey Irving

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.