U.S. Neutrality in Egypt Not Possible

{
  "authors": [
    "Michele Dunne"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Arab Awakening"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North Africa",
    "Egypt"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

U.S. Neutrality in Egypt Not Possible

Regardless of who takes over after Egyptian President Mubarak's resignation, the United States should do what it can to support a transition to genuine democracy and free and fair elections.

By Michele Dunne

Published on Feb 10, 2011

Source: Bloomberg TV

The expected resignation of President Mubarak is both an important and a perilous moment for Egypt, said Michele Dunne on Bloomberg TV’s Fast Forward. For the moment, the Egyptian military appears to be taking control, but it remains to be seen whether they will put Egypt on track for a democratic transition. Dunne commented that while the military initially played a stabilizing role, attempting to mediate between the protesters and the regime, they also permitted regime thugs to harass and harm the protesters. It is not clear whether the military will really ensure that the repressive methods of the regime will cease.

Looking to the West, Dunne said that the United States has had a long and deep relationship with Egypt. As a result of this history, it is not possible for the Obama administration to be neutral as events in Egypt continue to unfold. While the administration has been careful since crisis began, Dunne pointed out that it has called on the Egyptian state to meet the demands of the people. The people in Egypt are eager to hear what the United States says, Dunne said, concluding that it is vital for the Obama administration to support a transition to democracy and free and fair elections.

About the Author

Michele Dunne

Former Nonresident Scholar, Middle East Program

Michele Dunne was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where her research focuses on political and economic change in Arab countries, particularly Egypt, as well as U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Recent Work

Research
Islamic Institutions in Arab States: Mapping the Dynamics of Control, Co-option, and Contention
- +6
  Yasmine Farouk, Nathan J. Brown, Maysaa Shuja Al-Deen, …
Research
From Hardware to Holism: Rebalancing America’s Security Engagement With Arab States
- +8
  Robert Springborg, Emile Hokayem, Becca Wasser, …

Political Reform Foreign Policy North Africa Egypt

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Strategic Europe
The Uncomfortable Truth About EU Enlargement
Before the next wave of EU enlargement takes place, the union needs to grapple with thorny questions of how power is distributed among its members.
Emil Sondaj Hansen, Ditte Brasso Sørensen
Commentary
Emissary
What to Watch When Trump and Xi Meet in Washington
The real test may come after the leaders leave the room.
+1
Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Oriana Skylar Mastro, Yukon Huang, …
Commentary
Emissary
The Impacts of the Houthis’ Advance Could Extend Well Beyond Saudi Arabia
The Horn of Africa countries are among those facing a new security calculus.
Andrew Leber, Lesley Anne Warner
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?
The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.
Dimitar Bechev
Commentary
The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time
The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.
Marc Pierini

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Ukraine Poland Zelensky Tusk Enlargement EU

Commentary

Strategic Europe

The Uncomfortable Truth About EU Enlargement

Before the next wave of EU enlargement takes place, the union needs to grapple with thorny questions of how power is distributed among its members.

Emil Sondaj Hansen, Ditte Brasso Sørensen

Commentary

Emissary

What to Watch When Trump and Xi Meet in Washington

The real test may come after the leaders leave the room.

- +1
Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Oriana Skylar Mastro, Yukon Huang, …

Commentary

Emissary

The Impacts of the Houthis’ Advance Could Extend Well Beyond Saudi Arabia

The Horn of Africa countries are among those facing a new security calculus.

Andrew Leber, Lesley Anne Warner

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?

The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.

Dimitar Bechev

Greenland United States Denmark Agreement Nuuk

Commentary

The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time

The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.

Marc Pierini