• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "Japan",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic Catastrophe

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic or financial consequences.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 20, 2011

Source: El Pais

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic CatastropheIt is as impossible not to be moved by the images of suffering and destruction in Japan as it is not to be surprised by the stoicism of the victims. Usually, the scenes following a disaster are of panic, disorder, and even looting. In Japan, we see long lines of people calmly awaiting medical attention or buying food. And faces that reflect an unimaginable pain that is seldom expressed stridently. The Japanese deserve our admiration and solidarity.

The international financial markets are also behaving at odds with what one would expect after such a disaster. They are betting that the Japanese economy recuperates sooner than the images of devastation may suggest. They also bet that the financial impact in other countries will be minor and the long-term economic effects will not be significant.

Less than one week after disaster hit Japan—with the nuclear plants still burning and the stock market in decline—international investment funds specializing in Japanese companies received record amounts of money. That week, investors deposited $956 million; the week before, the amount was a meager $180 million.

The same happened with the currency. Days after the tragedy, the yen reached its highest level since World War II. A currency this strong has very harmful effects on the country’s exports and causes multiple international imbalances. The central banks of the seven most industrialized countries intervened and were able to stabilize the yen at more reasonable levels. This, too, was unusual: central bank coordination of this kind had not happened in over a decade.

The yen had strengthened because the markets anticipated a massive repatriation of Japanese capital deposited in other countries and currencies. As this money will be needed to finance the nation’s reconstruction, demand for the yen will obviously increase. Assuming that this would raise the value of the currency, speculators rushed to buy yen. But in this case some lost their bet: the central banks’ intervention contained the yen’s appreciation.

Those who will probably not lose, however, are the investors betting on Japan’s rapid recovery. While this accident was devastating, the highest estimate of its costs is $300 million, with a majority of analysts estimating the damage at $200 million. If proven correct, this estimate represents only 4 percent of Japanese economic activity and 1 percent of the country’s wealth. Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf points out that in Japan, the world financial crisis had an impact equivalent to 10 percent of its economy, and Japan had the hardest-hit economy among the world’s richest nations. Even though the images we saw in Japan after the financial crisis were not as painful and dramatic as those we see now, the reality is that the 2009 crash affected a vastly larger number of Japanese.

Another calculation is that Japan’s recovery will be as quick as those of other major catastrophes. HSBC’s Garry Evans studied the financial impacts of the earthquakes in Kobe, Japan in 1995, Taiwan in 1999, Chile in 2010, and the September 11 terrorist attacks. He found that after an initial fall, the respective stock markets recovered to their pre-catastrophe level between 23 and 78 days afterward. One hundred days later, they were above this level. Moreover, the economies affected by these disasters grew, thanks to the stimulus sparked by the reconstruction efforts and investments. In 2010, Chile suffered from a devastating earthquake and grew 5 percent. After the Kobe earthquake, Japan’s growth rate also accelerated.

Obviously, Japan’s tragedy has other negative economic effects, many of which may not even be apparent yet. For now it is clear, for example, that global supply chains have been disrupted by the damage to Japan’s manufacturing base. This, in turn, may fuel global inflationary pressures. The insurance sector will also be hard hit, as will the nuclear energy industry. That this will be the case is another conclusion international markets seem to have reached: as the price of most other commodities has soared, that of uranium dropped 30 percent.

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic consequences.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyNuclear EnergyEast AsiaJapanNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy
    Report
    Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy

    At the heart of Biden’s approach to China was the consolidation of a framework for strategic competition with an eye toward coexistence.

      • Senkai Hsia

      Christopher S. Chivvis, Senkai Hsia

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

  • Seoul traffic at night
    Commentary
    Emissary
    How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive Agenda

    The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • apan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi (L) reacts as US President Donald Trump delivers a speech in front of US Navy personnel on board the US Navy's USS George Washington aircraft carrier at the US naval base in Yokosuka on October 28, 2025.
    Article
    Takaichi’s Security Agenda After the Landslide Election

    Backed by a new LDP supermajority, Prime Minister Takaichi aspires to revise Japan’s long-standing security doctrine. Ahead of her visit to Washington, she faces fiscal hurdles for her proposed defense spending while needing to navigate President Trump’s request for naval assets to the Strait of Hormuz.

      • Harukata Takenaka

      Harukata Takenaka

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.