in the media

Nuclear Disaster: Could It Happen Here... Again?

Although the nuclear reactor crisis in Japan will likely launch a debate about safety, there are stark differences between Japan and the United States in the environmental scenarios that must be considered when designing U.S. nuclear reactors.

published by
CNBC
 on March 13, 2011

Source: CNBC

In an interview with CNBC, James Acton explored the implications of Japan’s nuclear crisis on resurgent interest in nuclear energy in the United States. Acton explained that Japan’s Fukushima reactors were not designed to withstand an earthquake and a tsunami of the magnitude that struck the island on March 11. While this crisis will re-kindle a debate on nuclear safety in the United States and prompt a reassessment of earthquake preparedness, Acton stressed that any method used to generate electricity has associated risks. A crisis like the one facing the Japanese boiling water reactor in Fukushima underscores the need for the nuclear industry to be forthright about the challenges it faces in ensuring reactor safety. Acton concluded, however, that it is important to remember that reactors have advanced considerably in the last three decades and modern reactors have safety systems designed to avoid crises like the one presently unfolding in Japan.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.