Other
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Nuclear Situation in Japan Seems to be Stabilizing
While the Fukushima reactor crisis, resulting from Japan's devastating earthquake and tsunami, remains unresolved, some positive developments have been made. The possibility of spent fuel pools overheating is now the main source of concern.
Published on Mar 22, 2011
Source: NBC
ANN CURRY, NBC: James Acton is a nuclear expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Acton, good morning.
JAMES ACTON, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Good morning, Ann.
CURRY: First, I want to ask you about this AP report that's just in that is quoting a Japanese official--safety official by name saying that a pool of--for storing spent fuel is heating up and is now around the boiling point and may have been the source for the steam that raised so much concern on Monday. If true, how significant?
ACTON: We've seen over the last few days increasing concern about the state of these spent fuel pools. And if the water is boiling, then that does create concern because it might evaporate. And then at that point there's the risk of the fuel rods overheating. But the piece of good news here is that if the pool is boiling and there's still a lot of water in it, then there's likely to be substantial time to solve this problem. So this is a matter of concern but not of grave concern yet.
CURRY: So much has been happening regarding this nuclear power plant and its reactors, I think that it's very difficult for all of us, the laymen especially, to really understand this. Bottom line, given all the conditions of the--of the past week plus, are we any closer to being safe than we were about a week ago regarding this possibility of a catastrophic release of radiation?
ACTON: Yes we are, but we're certainly not out of the woods yet. You know, I woke up every morning during the first six or seven days of this crisis--maybe five or six days--and every single morning there was some major new piece of bad news. This crisis for the first week was in a position where it was deteriorating and deteriorating relatively quickly. Now we still had bad news over the past few days but it hasn't been nearly as bad and nearly as serious as the new--as the news items in the first week of this crisis. And there's starting to be just the tiniest parts of good news coming through.
CURRY: At the same time, Bob Bazell reported just now that cement trucks are rolling towards this nuclear power plant, the idea being that they would use basically a special mixture to kind of entomb these rods. Has this actually ever been used, this procedure on a--on a nuclear--on nuclear reactors in the state that the Fukushima plant reactors are in?
ACTON: Ann, I haven't had enough information to know yet what they--whether what they're trying to do here is similar to the entombment that they--that the Chernobyl reactor was encased in after 1986. But, you know, the fact that they're considering this kind of option clearly demonstrates the gravity of the situation.
CURRY: All right, James Acton this morning. Thanks a lot, James, for giving us some perspective on this.
ACTON: Thank you.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Time for Nuclear Recycling? Prospects and Implications During a Global Nuclear Energy RenewalPaper
Nuclear recycling has emerged as a salient, cross-cutting issue, one that is heavily dependent on broader choices among reactor designs, fuel availability, economic resources, technological options, and political choices. States and nuclear industries seeking to advance recycling must devote sustained consideration now to the interplay of all these factors.
Etienne Pochon
- Beyond the Hype: Assessing Hyperscaler Nuclear Commitments Against U.S. Energy RealitiesPaper
The coming decade will require technology companies to decide how nuclear fits into their energy strategies—and grapple with the obligations that follow.
John Pendleton, Mackenzie Schuessler
- China’s Police and Security Cooperation AgreementsPaper
China’s Ministry of Public Security is often portrayed as a domestic law enforcement agency, but it is also a global security actor. This paper explores how MPS has used international law enforcement and security cooperation agreements—over 200 since 2006—to advance China’s vision of security in a changing global environment.
Sophie Zhuang, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Cameron Waltz
- Europe Should Not Let Nuclear Nonproliferation DieCommentary
Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.
Jane Darby Menton
- Post U.S.-China Summit: Managed InstabilityCommentary
The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response.
Barbara Weisel
