Paper
James M. Acton, Ankit Panda
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Nuclear Situation in Japan Seems to be Stabilizing
While the Fukushima reactor crisis, resulting from Japan's devastating earthquake and tsunami, remains unresolved, some positive developments have been made. The possibility of spent fuel pools overheating is now the main source of concern.
Published on Mar 22, 2011
Source: NBC
ANN CURRY, NBC: James Acton is a nuclear expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Acton, good morning.
JAMES ACTON, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Good morning, Ann.
CURRY: First, I want to ask you about this AP report that's just in that is quoting a Japanese official--safety official by name saying that a pool of--for storing spent fuel is heating up and is now around the boiling point and may have been the source for the steam that raised so much concern on Monday. If true, how significant?
ACTON: We've seen over the last few days increasing concern about the state of these spent fuel pools. And if the water is boiling, then that does create concern because it might evaporate. And then at that point there's the risk of the fuel rods overheating. But the piece of good news here is that if the pool is boiling and there's still a lot of water in it, then there's likely to be substantial time to solve this problem. So this is a matter of concern but not of grave concern yet.
CURRY: So much has been happening regarding this nuclear power plant and its reactors, I think that it's very difficult for all of us, the laymen especially, to really understand this. Bottom line, given all the conditions of the--of the past week plus, are we any closer to being safe than we were about a week ago regarding this possibility of a catastrophic release of radiation?
ACTON: Yes we are, but we're certainly not out of the woods yet. You know, I woke up every morning during the first six or seven days of this crisis--maybe five or six days--and every single morning there was some major new piece of bad news. This crisis for the first week was in a position where it was deteriorating and deteriorating relatively quickly. Now we still had bad news over the past few days but it hasn't been nearly as bad and nearly as serious as the new--as the news items in the first week of this crisis. And there's starting to be just the tiniest parts of good news coming through.
CURRY: At the same time, Bob Bazell reported just now that cement trucks are rolling towards this nuclear power plant, the idea being that they would use basically a special mixture to kind of entomb these rods. Has this actually ever been used, this procedure on a--on a nuclear--on nuclear reactors in the state that the Fukushima plant reactors are in?
ACTON: Ann, I haven't had enough information to know yet what they--whether what they're trying to do here is similar to the entombment that they--that the Chernobyl reactor was encased in after 1986. But, you know, the fact that they're considering this kind of option clearly demonstrates the gravity of the situation.
CURRY: All right, James Acton this morning. Thanks a lot, James, for giving us some perspective on this.
ACTON: Thank you.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Nuclear Weapons and the Future of American Power
- The Latest Iran Deal Ignores the Lessons of the PastCommentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Can Nuclear Fuel Be Delivered in Time to Power Advanced Nuclear Reactors?Paper
Producing nuclear fuel quickly enough remains a major risk factor for the emerging advanced reactor industry.
Elmer W. Dyke
- Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech PolicyResearch
A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.
- +5
Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis
- Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its AlliesPaper
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
- In Pursuit of Nuclear-Powered Submarines: Australia, South Korea, And JapanResearch
A look at why states without nuclear weapons are seeking naval nuclear propulsion, whether they can legally and technically deliver it, what it will cost them, and what responsible stewardship of the capability would look like.
Jamie Kwong
