Other
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Nuclear Situation in Japan Seems to be Stabilizing
While the Fukushima reactor crisis, resulting from Japan's devastating earthquake and tsunami, remains unresolved, some positive developments have been made. The possibility of spent fuel pools overheating is now the main source of concern.
Published on Mar 22, 2011
Source: NBC
ANN CURRY, NBC: James Acton is a nuclear expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Acton, good morning.
JAMES ACTON, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Good morning, Ann.
CURRY: First, I want to ask you about this AP report that's just in that is quoting a Japanese official--safety official by name saying that a pool of--for storing spent fuel is heating up and is now around the boiling point and may have been the source for the steam that raised so much concern on Monday. If true, how significant?
ACTON: We've seen over the last few days increasing concern about the state of these spent fuel pools. And if the water is boiling, then that does create concern because it might evaporate. And then at that point there's the risk of the fuel rods overheating. But the piece of good news here is that if the pool is boiling and there's still a lot of water in it, then there's likely to be substantial time to solve this problem. So this is a matter of concern but not of grave concern yet.
CURRY: So much has been happening regarding this nuclear power plant and its reactors, I think that it's very difficult for all of us, the laymen especially, to really understand this. Bottom line, given all the conditions of the--of the past week plus, are we any closer to being safe than we were about a week ago regarding this possibility of a catastrophic release of radiation?
ACTON: Yes we are, but we're certainly not out of the woods yet. You know, I woke up every morning during the first six or seven days of this crisis--maybe five or six days--and every single morning there was some major new piece of bad news. This crisis for the first week was in a position where it was deteriorating and deteriorating relatively quickly. Now we still had bad news over the past few days but it hasn't been nearly as bad and nearly as serious as the new--as the news items in the first week of this crisis. And there's starting to be just the tiniest parts of good news coming through.
CURRY: At the same time, Bob Bazell reported just now that cement trucks are rolling towards this nuclear power plant, the idea being that they would use basically a special mixture to kind of entomb these rods. Has this actually ever been used, this procedure on a--on a nuclear--on nuclear reactors in the state that the Fukushima plant reactors are in?
ACTON: Ann, I haven't had enough information to know yet what they--whether what they're trying to do here is similar to the entombment that they--that the Chernobyl reactor was encased in after 1986. But, you know, the fact that they're considering this kind of option clearly demonstrates the gravity of the situation.
CURRY: All right, James Acton this morning. Thanks a lot, James, for giving us some perspective on this.
ACTON: Thank you.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang
- Digital Hegemony and the Reification of Taiwan’s “Unification-Independence” DichotomyArticle
Governments now deploy online platforms to shape public opinion and influence collective cognition. This is acutely apparent between China and Taiwan.
Frank Cheng-Shan Liu
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
- In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in AsiaCommentary
The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
- Japan’s Security Policy Is Still Caught Between the Alliance and Domestic RealityArticle
Japan’s response to U.S. pressure over Hormuz highlights a broader dilemma: How to preserve the alliance while remaining bound by legal limits, public opinion, and an Asia-centered security agenda. Tokyo gained diplomatic space through an alliance-embracing strategy, but only under conditions that may not endure.
Ryo Sahashi
