- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}Source: Getty
Unclear Whether Exposed Spent Fuel Rods Will Catch Fire
Conditions at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear reactors, damaged by the devastating earthquake and subsequent tsunami, remain tense, as water levels around the spent fuel rods in one reactor continue to drop, exposing the rods to the air.
Source: NBC
In the wake of the devastating earthquake and subsequent tsunami on March 11, Japan’s Fukushima nuclear reactor crisis took serious damage, although the extent of the damage remains unclear. Of particular concern is the spent fuel pool in reactor four. Water surrounding these rods is intended to both shield the spent fuel rods from releasing radiation and to cool them, explained Carnegie’s James Acton to Matt Lauer on NBC’s Today Show. However, water levels have gone down and the rods are now exposed. It remains unclear why water levels have dropped or what will happen as the fuel rods grow more exposed. Acton explained that evaporation is unlikely to have caused the depleted water levels, suggesting that there is a reasonable chance the pool was damaged by the tsunami. Nuclear experts disagree on whether the rods will start burning when exposed, Acton added.
With so much uncertainty and a situation that has escalated far beyond what the nuclear plants were designed to handle has required the Japanese government to improvise, Acton said. Helicopters have dumped tons of water onto reactor three in an effort to keep it cool. Throughout the Fukushima nuclear power plant, radiation levels have been fluctuating wildly and workers there are operating at great personal risk. Acton suggested that the depth of this crisis indicates a need for a wholesale review of whether nuclear plants are capable of withstanding the full range of disasters to which they may be exposed.
About the Author
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Two Wars Later, Iran’s Nuclear Question Is Still on the TableCommentary
Tehran may conclude that its ability to disrupt the global economy via the Strait of Hormuz provides enough deterrence to begin quietly rebuilding its nuclear program.
Jane Darby Menton, Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar
- Could the Iran War Push Japan to Restore Russian Oil Imports?Commentary
Tokyo would have to surmount a lot of obstacles—not least Western sanctions—if it wanted to return Russian oil imports to even modest pre-2022 volumes.
Vladislav Pashchenko
- Chernobyl Is Still a Current Event, Forty Years LaterCommentary
The 1986 incident showed that a nuclear accident anytime is a nuclear accident for all time.
Corey Hinderstein
- From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East AsiaArticle
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
- Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI CompetitionArticle
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee