James M. Acton, Ankit Panda
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}Source: Getty
Unclear Whether Exposed Spent Fuel Rods Will Catch Fire
Conditions at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear reactors, damaged by the devastating earthquake and subsequent tsunami, remain tense, as water levels around the spent fuel rods in one reactor continue to drop, exposing the rods to the air.
Source: NBC
In the wake of the devastating earthquake and subsequent tsunami on March 11, Japan’s Fukushima nuclear reactor crisis took serious damage, although the extent of the damage remains unclear. Of particular concern is the spent fuel pool in reactor four. Water surrounding these rods is intended to both shield the spent fuel rods from releasing radiation and to cool them, explained Carnegie’s James Acton to Matt Lauer on NBC’s Today Show. However, water levels have gone down and the rods are now exposed. It remains unclear why water levels have dropped or what will happen as the fuel rods grow more exposed. Acton explained that evaporation is unlikely to have caused the depleted water levels, suggesting that there is a reasonable chance the pool was damaged by the tsunami. Nuclear experts disagree on whether the rods will start burning when exposed, Acton added.
With so much uncertainty and a situation that has escalated far beyond what the nuclear plants were designed to handle has required the Japanese government to improvise, Acton said. Helicopters have dumped tons of water onto reactor three in an effort to keep it cool. Throughout the Fukushima nuclear power plant, radiation levels have been fluctuating wildly and workers there are operating at great personal risk. Acton suggested that the depth of this crisis indicates a need for a wholesale review of whether nuclear plants are capable of withstanding the full range of disasters to which they may be exposed.
About the Author
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Nuclear Weapons and the Future of American PowerPaper
- The Latest Iran Deal Ignores the Lessons of the PastCommentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Fallout of the U.S.–Canada Trade War Won’t Be Limited to North AmericaCommentary
U.S. trading partners in Asia are closely watching the dispute for signs of how it may affect their own interests.
Barbara Weisel
- Is the U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Deal Moving From the Gold Standard to a Gilded Standard?Commentary
Congress should ask tough questions about the agreement’s more unique features and whether they advance U.S. interests or compromise them.
Jane Darby Menton
- A Nuclear Odyssey at SeaCommentary
Nuclear and maritime communities face a long and challenging journey to deploy commercial nuclear applications at sea.
Jamie Kwong, Toby Dalton
- The Two Logics Driving Japan’s Security PolicyArticle
Japan’s revision of its three strategic documents reflects an intention to keep the United States engaged in the region while Japan fills any vacuums of U.S. power to preserve the Indo-Pacific order.
Ryo Sahashi
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong