Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}Source: Getty
The Threat of China's Unbalanced Economy
Persistent imbalances in China's economy are likely to pose a serious threat to the country's growth unless Beijing significantly revalues its currency, raises real interest rates, and continues to increase wages.
Source: Bloomberg
Carnegie’s Michael Pettis spoke on Bloomberg Television’s On the Move Asia about China's economy, central bank monetary policy, and currency. China’s consumer prices rose 5.3 percent in April compared to a year earlier, exceeding the government’s full-year target for a fourth straight month.
The Relationship Between Inflation and Interest Rates
Although China's April inflation figures were slightly lower than the previous month, Pettis noted that many experts had predicted inflation rates would peak in July or August of this year. Thus, it remains to be seen whether inflation has started a long-term declining trend. Pettis added that although it may seem counterintuitive, raising interest rates may not be an effective way for Beijing to stem inflation, since such an action will increase household income and consumption, thus adding to inflationary pressure.
The Need for Comprehensive Rebalancing
In order to rebalance its economy, Pettis suggested that Beijing needs to adopt a comprehensive approach that includes revaluing its currency, raising interest rates, and raising wages. Although wages are rising in real terms, after adjusting for inflation and productivity growth differentials, "the currency is barely appreciating in real terms," Pettis said. Most importantly, although nominal interest rates have gone up, real interest rates have actually been negative. Thus, Pettis stated, "In the aggregate, it is very hard to say that China is rebalancing."
These continued imbalances were discussed in a recent IMF report which noted that consumption growth in China slowed last year, Pettis noted. Moreover, massive increases in investment in China are becoming increasingly misallocated and ineffective, which historically has always been associated with an unsustainable rise in debt. If such trends continue, this excessive investment will pose a serious threat to China's growth.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Iran War Has Sparked a Domestic Crisis in KenyaCommentary
The conflict has sent economic and political shock waves through a country with no representation at the negotiating table—and Kenya is not alone.
Georgia Schaefer-Brown, Jane Munga
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- The Two Logics Driving Japan’s Security PolicyArticle
Japan’s revision of its three strategic documents reflects an intention to keep the United States engaged in the region while Japan fills any vacuums of U.S. power to preserve the Indo-Pacific order.
Ryo Sahashi
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Inside the Global Race to Erode a Battery Manufacturing MonopolyCommentary
Over the past decade, China has moved from marginal player to major producer of all things batteries. The United States, Europe, and others are aiming to balance the market.
Milo McBride