Commentary
Alexey Malashenko
{
"authors": [
"Alexey Malashenko"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [
"Eurasia in Transition"
],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Kazakhstan"
],
"topics": []
}
Source: Getty
Tough Times Ahead for Kazakhstan
The turbulent events of 2011 in Kazakhstan have forced the country's ruling elite to consider economic and even political change in order to enable their continued rule.
Published on Feb 29, 2012
There was never any shortage of attention paid to Kazakhstan by politicians and analysts. Interest in the country is on the increase today, due to changes looming on the horizon there and the emergence of new trends in its development. First in this context is the expected leadership change.
Alexey Malashenko analyzes the recent developments in Kazakhstan and the possible future of this country.
Key Conclusions:
- All of Kazakhstan’s politicians recognize the need for change, even those who are happy with the way things are now, or who find change difficult to initiate. Kazakhstan’s political elite is firmly set on change because it is the most essential condition for ensuring the elite’s continued rule.
- In 2011, Kazakhstan went through upheavals unprecedented in its independent history: an upsurge in Islamist activity, terrorist attacks, and the events in Zhanaozen, which claimed numerous lives. These events have all forced the ruling elite to give serious thought to economic and perhaps political change.
- An opposition has not emerged in Kazakhstani society. Neither the events in Zhanaozen nor the Islamist groups’ activeness have received broad public support. This is as much due to the preventive measures taken by the authorities as to Kazakhstani society simply not yet being ready for protest.
- Nazarbayev’s Nur Otan party won a convincing victory in the parliamentary election, as was expected. The election results were unchallenged, despite the irregularities that took place during the election preparations and the election itself.
- Although integration within the Eurasian Union seems to be progressing well, the future of Russia-Kazakhstan relations will depend in large part upon the domestic situation in both countries. There is the risk that in the event of crisis, Moscow (and Minsk) could resort to protectionist measures. Changes in domestic policy in Russia brought on by protests, as well as possible change in Kazakhstan, could also affect the two countries’ foreign policy and the development of their relations.
About the Author
Alexey Malashenko
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.
- What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?
- Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim CommunityCommentary
Alexey Malashenko
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Multiple Wars Are Ruining Central Asia’s Efforts to Diversify Its Trade RoutesCommentary
This year’s wars have made alternative routes to transit through Russia no less risky for Central Asian countries.
Galiya Ibragimova
- Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?Commentary
The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.
Salavat Abylkalikov
- Continental Asia and the Rise of Portfolio PoliticsArticle
“Central Asia” as an analytical category is itself part of the problem. The term is a Soviet administrative inheritance, drawn along lines that served the convenience of Moscow. The Central Asian states the Soviets named no longer see themselves through this category alone and are not aligning across political blocs but are instead building external partnerships sector by sector, assigning different partners to different functions.
Jennifer B. Murtazashvili
- The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead EndCommentary
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
- Power, Pathways, and Policy: Grounding Central Asia’s Digital AmbitionsCommentary
Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.
Aruzhan Meirkhanova
