Turkey: A Bridge Between Two Worlds

Turkey is attempting to position itself as a more than a regional power, with activity in all its neighboring regions. It remains to be seen, however, whether Turkey has enough forces to be present in so many places.

by Yekaterina KudashkinaYuri Tavrovsky, and Alexey Malashenko
published by
Voice of Russia
 on June 7, 2012

Source: Voice of Russia

Interview with Alexey Malashenko – one of the best Russian experts in political Islam and a scholar with the Carnegie Moscow Center.

Today we are going to try to get a better understanding of what kind of role Turkey is playing in the current geopolitical situation because obviously Mr. Erdogan has been pressing to promote his country as not only the regional player but it seems that he is trying to more and more promote it as a global player. How do you see that?

Indeed, I understand your question but it seems that the answer on it couldn’t be simple because last year in summer, even in spring, indeed Istanbul or Ankara, they attempted to position themselves as a much more than a regional power, their ambitions became more broader. And suddenly maybe they understood that indeed they are on the crossroad between Europe, United States, Middle East, Muslim world and Russia by the way too. And they made, I mean in Istanbul, several very important steps and they began active participation in the political activity and generally in the political situation in the Middle East, and they did something. At the moment in Egypt, in Syria, everywhere they must and they do take into consideration the position of Turkey from all the points of view, would it be political, economic and even religious.

And just there is an idea that Turkey attempts to reconstruct the Ottoman Empire. Of course they refuse to recognize it but anyway their activity approves that they want to be involved in all kinds of situations in the region. So, that’s true. Let’s add to it their activity in the Central Asia. I don’t want to exaggerate it but anyway the position of Turkey’s activity is respected and taken into consideration in Kazakhstan, in Kyrgyzstan, in Uzbekistan and so on. I don’t even want to mention Caucasia where the Turkish are present all the time and I would say are very important. So, we could say about some political and economic offshoots of Turkey to all directions. And moreover, don’t forget their ambitions to become a real member of the European community.

So, if before, five years ago, the general opinion was that Turkey is first of all an ally of the West or the United States, at the moment they attempt to play an autonomous, independent role. But first of all I don’t know if they are able to do it because Turkey is not China, it is not America and they haven’t enough forces to be present everywhere. So, they have to make an option where they want to be present more, be more active – this is a problem number one. The second problem is in the Arab world. From the beginning of course they were very glad, I mean the so called revolutionary forces, when they saw that Turkey is ready to help and give some assistance. But at the moment once again the historical fear is beginning to come back because as we suddenly understood in the Arab world they never forgot about the Turkish Empire.

So, now Turkey occupies a double position – of course it is respected but I repeat once again don’t forget about the fear of Turks. In the Central Asia of course they accelerated their presence, they once again began to talk about the Turkish world, Turkish culture and so on. In the Central Asia – in Kazakhstan, in Kyrgyzstan they’ve never forgot about the first wave of Turkish arrival in the region and it failed. So, just there are sometimes political misunderstandings.

If we want to understand the Turkish role as a bridge between the West, between the Muslim world and something else, well… this bridge is just very difficult to build. So, I think that Turkey sometimes occupy the so called double position as far as Iran is concerned, as far as Egypt is concerned. Of course Turkey is an ally of the West and America but the relations between the Europe and Turkey, between the United States and Turkey are not so easy to understand because we have to recognize the presence of the so called rivalry.

I repeat once again about the Caucasia where indeed Ankara is able to play a very prominent role and I repeat once again that Turkey has to do a certain option. In my opinion Turkey will turn more and more to Caucasia where it is able to do something basing by the way on the cooperation with Russia. So, I don’t expect a huge presence of Turkey in the Middle East. I doubt that Turkey will be able to create a new model of relations with the Central Asia. The main direction of Turkish foreign politics resides in Caucasia and of course in the European and Western direction. But anyway it is a problem of the Turkish Government, of Erdogan, of the President Gul. And indeed it is very interesting, very I would say problematic that the country is now on the crossroad.

And a very short question now. Experts are broadly discussing what they term to be a Turkish model of Government with, like they put it, moderate Islamists being at the helm of the Government. They are saying that this model is gradually spreading all over the Arab Spring countries. Do you think that this is a viable concept?

Nobody knows it indeed and I don’t know either. Of course the Turkish model is very interesting but it is a certain exception. I know my colleagues who admit the possibility of construction of such a political model in Egypt or in Tunisia for instance. Ok, it is possible, there are moderates or soft Islamists, it is very well, but all the time inside this moderate branch of Islamism there is a radical trend. And if moderation as a phenomenon fails somebody will say – that’s happened because we didn’t use Islam…

Right! I got your point.

Yes. So, moderate Islamism is very well but I don’t know what kind of trend will develop inside it.

Pr. Malashenko, may I ask you a question? You know, as an observer of Far Eastern affairs I’m a little bit puzzled that Turkey is going to get the observer status in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization during this Summit which takes place now in Beijing. So, I don’t quite understand because if Turkey is interested in, let’s say, penetration to the Central Asian countries, then it has another framework – the so called Turkic Language States Council. Do you think they are really interested in going as far east as China and eastern regions of the Russian Federation?

It is a very good question. I think that at the moment Turkey will attempt to use all kinds of instruments in order to penetrate in the Central Asia, would it be the Shanghai Organization or something else, that’s no doubt. But at the same time when we talk in the frames of the Shanghai Organization don’t forget that first of all it is a Chinese organization, not Russian, not international, but the Chinese organization where China is the most powerful state. And without the Chinese position nothing could be done.

And besides there are a lot of ideas of how to make the Shanghai Organization broader, to take India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Mongolia and so on. If it happens I think that Shanghai Organization as a real institution will disappear because I cannot imagine the organization with India, Pakistan, China and so on, it is useless. In case if it happens we would see a double-leveled Shanghai Organization. The first level would be very pragmatic with China, with Russia, maybe with Mongolia, maybe, I don’t know. And the second level will be a virtual level with the participation of all kinds of countries including Turkey, even Brazil and so on.

This interview originally appeared on Voice of Russia.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.