• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Pogroms

Last weekend, two districts of Moscow became a battlefield between the police and the people described as nationalists by mass media or as hooligans by the authorities. Moscow has been a place of pogroms many times, but this time the authorities were more efficient than in previous cases.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Oct 18, 2013

Last weekend, two districts of Moscow became a battlefield between the police and the people described as nationalists by mass media or as hooligans by the authorities. The pretext was a murder of a Muscovite by a person of a South Caucasus origin. The Ministry of Internal Affairs launched an operation Vulcan to prevent proliferation of the riots and detain suspect organizers and activists of those events. Over 200 people were arrested. About a dozen police were injured.

Moscow has been a place of pogroms many times, including several incidences after the Soviet Union collapse. It seems that last weekend the authorities were more efficient than in previous cases, yet still not enough. The question is, how efficient they can be?

According to several studies of the mass violence phenomenon worldwide, the first wave of pogroms is often missed by the law enforcement agencies, despite their awareness of a high probability of pogroms. It can be explained in two ways. On the one hand, these agencies need some time to assess probability and possible scale of pogroms in order to deploy an appropriate number of troops.

On another hand, the agencies can actually let rioters initiate pogroms attempting to achieve two goals. One of them is the canalization of feelings of disobedience of people. The second goal may be to exert pressure on some communities which become the target of such pogroms.

Anyway, the perception of a pogrom as chaos does not reflect the reality. According to Natalie Zemon Davis, “Even in the extreme case of religious violence, crowds do not act in a mindless way”. This can be witnessed in many incidences. For instance, Ian Talbot in his study of The 1947 Violence in Punjab demonstrated the existence of an organized effort behind the mass violence and a certain structure to support it.

What we can do if the pogrom is not totally unavoidable? I absolutely agree with doctor Davis, who argues that if we want to secure trust and ensure safety in society and to guarantee that the violence it generates will take the least cruel of forms, then we must think more about changing the central values of the society to emphasize tolerance and the use of non-violent ways of conflict resolution.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

  • In The Media
    Premonition of Nuclear Threat

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
Political ReformCivil SocietyRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Is Belarus’s Approach to Online Censorship So Different From Russia’s?

    For Lukashenko, abandoning Western internet services and embracing Russian equivalents would mean tying himself even closer to Moscow.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics Returns

    The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?

    Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.

      James D.J. Brown

  • Smoke rising over a  bridge
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Iran War Is a Stress Test for Gulf States

    The conflict is exposing the flaws and fissures of their domestic governance and social cohesion.

      Frederic Wehrey, Charles H. Johnson

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.