Wang Tao
{
"authors": [
"Wang Tao"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change"
]
}Source: Getty
Going Green Now for China
Dependence on cheap coal has resulted in high social and environmental costs for China which are only going to increase without the creation of policy framework for integrating less polluting technologies.
Source: CCTV
Carnegie–Tsinghua’s Wang Tao appeared on CCTV English’s Asia Biz to share his insights on the probability of a substantial Chinese shift to green energy. He argued that dependence on cheap coal has resulted in high social and environmental costs for China which are likely to increase without the creation of policy framework for integrating less polluting technologies. The energy structure in China is already changing as the nation moves toward an economy based more on service than on heavy industry.
China’s major cities are at the forefront of efforts to tackle pollution, explained Wang, with some beginning to experiment with carbon trading incentives in order to reduce pollution. Wang also explained how the current pollution problem has made cities like Beijing less attractive places to live. Highly skilled workers, with options to work in less polluted areas, could leave if conditions worsen, he concluded.
This video interview was originally published on CCTV English’s Asia Biz.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Wang Tao was a nonresident scholar in the Energy and Climate Program based at the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy.
- Xi’s Global Leadership Ambitions in the Trump EraArticle
- How the Paris Conference Is Driving China’s Gas and Oil ReformsIn The Media
Wang Tao, Yang Yifang
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Climate Blind Spot in Europe’s New Migration PactCommentary
The EU’s new migration policy is not suited to today’s realities. With climate change increasingly becoming a driver of displacement, Europe needs to rethink its deterrence-focused approach.
Shana Tabak
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
- Trump’s AI Order Won’t Stymie U.S. Competition with ChinaCommentary
Beijing regulated AI—and then Chinese AI companies took off.
Matt Sheehan
- Are Data Centers the Villains in the Battle Over Electricity?Commentary
Examples from Virginia and Lake Tahoe reveal complex situations that governments could use to fund critical grid upgrades.
Kate Gordon, Noah Gordon
- India’s Heatwave Is a Warning for the FutureCommentary
As “unprecedented” temperatures become routine, the country is failing its energy transition stress test.
Kayly Ober