Lina Khatib
{
"authors": [
"Lina Khatib"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Gulf",
"Levant",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security"
]
}Source: Getty
Syrian Forces Take Full Control of the Rebel Bastion Yabroud
The Syrian military’s recapture of Yabroud has severely weakened an already fragmented opposition.
Source: Radio France Internationale English
ERIN CONROY: Lina Khatib is the director for the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut.
Could you start by telling us a bit about where extremist groups in Syria are getting the bulk of their funding at the moment?
LINA KHATIB: The primary sponsors of jihad groups in Syria are Gulf countries: primarily Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. But we have to recognize that funding from those countries is not always state funding; sometimes it comes from non-state actors from the Gulf.ERIN CONROY: With Islamists in retreat now in Yabroud, where are they likely to seek refuge and where are they finding their support?
LINA KHATIB: The fighters who have been defeated in the latest battle in Yabroud have been fleeing in a number of directions, and a lot of them have headed to the north of Lebanon. In the north of Lebanon, they do have sympathy amongst certain Salafist groups who reside in that area, and currently, I know that there is a search taking place for rebel fighters who have fled Yabroud in that area.
Now that the Syrian state army has taken over Yabroud, this has significantly weakened the position of rebel extremists in the area. And Yabroud had been a main thoroughfare for explosives that had been smuggled into Lebanon and had been used for a number of the car bombs that had been detonated in the country over the past few months. So it is likely that we are going to see a reduction in the number of explosions happening in Lebanon orchestrated by Jabhat Al-Nusra and other groups, because Yabroud had been a main thoroughfare for the smuggling of explosives into Lebanon.
This also means that the Syrian state army is now mostly in control of the Qalamoun area, which basically means that, further down the line, the secular opposition in Syria is under threat as well of being defeated by the Syrian regime, and that is a different story that I think is not good news for the [unclear] of the armed rebellion against Present Bashar Al-Assad.
At the moment most of the rebels, if we’re talking about jihadist rebels, jihadist rebels are taking money from a number of sources in the Gulf. Some state funding from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, but mostly non-state funding from non-state actors who also happen to be Qatari or Saudi or from Kuwait. And sometimes those non-state actors are funding groups official Gulf countries are against. Those non-state actors are not necessarily following the official foreign policy of the countries they come from.
ERIN CONROY: And how have factures within rebel groups hurt their ability to get funding?
LINA KHATIB: A lot of the extremist groups in Syria get funding from competing sources and this has contributed to the lack of unity and homogeneity amongst those groups. There have been attempts, such as those led by Saudi Arabia, to bring some of the jihadist groups together under one umbrella such as the Islamic Fund. But a lot of the other groups remain fragmented, and that’s because they are sponsored by individual non-state actors who have their own strategic interest and agendas and are trying to get a stake in the Syrian conflict, which has made the operations of various jihadist groups on the ground in Syria rather weak.
I mean there’s one thing–which it’s about ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria–they are starting to generate their own funding in the north of Syria through the sale of petrol. This is a similar trajectory to what’s happening in Iraq in relation to funding of Islamist groups, ISIS becomes more or less self-financing.
In addition to external funding that channel towards rebel groups in Syria, there is also homegrown funding, which mainly comes from the sale of petrol in the north of Syria which groups like ISIS are reliant on. The trajectory so far is that such financing by rebel groups is becoming an increasing trend. It has already become an established trend in Iraq.
If Syria heads in the same direction as Iraq, then it’s become very difficult for any external or even internal actor to control the actions of rebel groups; because if they’re not reliant on the funding from outside then they don’t have any sponsors to answer to, which will make it very difficult to basically lead the conflict into any form of settlement.
ERIN CONROY: That was Lina Khatib. She is the director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut.
LINA KHATIB: Okay, excellent. Thank you so much.
This interview was originally broadcast on Radio France Internationale English.
About the Author
Former Director, Middle East Center
Khatib was director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut. Previously, she was the co-founding head of the Program on Arab Reform and Democracy at Stanford University’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law.
- Syria's Last Best Hope: The Southern FrontIn The Media
- The Islamic State’s Strategy: Lasting and ExpandingPaper
Lina Khatib
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Unintended Consequences of German DeterrenceResearch
Germany's sometimes ambiguous nuclear policy advocates nuclear weapons for deterrence purposes but at the same time adheres to non-proliferation. This dichotomy can turn into a formidable dilemma and increase proliferation pressures in Berlin once no nuclear protector is around anymore, a scenario that has become more realistic in recent years.
Ulrich Kühn
- The U.S. Risks Much, but Gains Little, with IranCommentary
In an interview, Hassan Mneimneh discusses the ongoing conflict and the myriad miscalculations characterizing it.
Michael Young
- The Greatest Dangers May Lie AheadCommentary
In an interview, Nicole Grajewski discusses the military dimension of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran.
Michael Young
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?Commentary
Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov